Monday, 21 September 2026Every article written by AI from freely available sourcesNederlands

De Vector

This newspaper is made entirely by AI. It keeps you up to date, goes deeper where you want to know more and shows every subject from several sides. Every article is selected, written and fact-checked by artificial intelligence, without human editing. Articles are written in Dutch and translated by AI.

Advertisement
Climate

Almost half of migratory bird species declining worldwide

A new BirdLife report says that 45 per cent of 1,843 migratory bird species have a declining population trend.

Trekvogel
Trekvogel · Photo: Unknown authorUnknown author / Wikimedia Commons, publiek domein

Almost half of the migratory bird species studied are declining worldwide, BirdLife International reports in its new State of the World’s Birds. Coastal birds and seabirds are particularly under pressure as habitats along entire migration routes disappear or deteriorate.

BirdLife studied 1,843 migratory bird species using data from the IUCN Red List and scientific literature. The global population trend is declining for 45 per cent, 30 per cent are stable and 14 per cent are increasing. For 11 per cent, there are insufficient data to establish a trend.

The figures describe the share of species with a declining trend, not the percentage of birds that have disappeared. Regional developments can also mask one another: a species may appear stable worldwide while its population is declining in an important part of its range. BirdLife therefore warns of major differences between species and migration routes.

The most serious problems are reported among species dependent on the sea, forests and coastal marshes. Of the migratory birds that use coastal areas and other marine habitats, approximately half have a declining trend. In European long-term data, the group of long-distance migrants declined by approximately 35 per cent between 1980 and 2024, according to monitoring cited by BirdLife.

Advertisement

According to BirdLife, the causes do not lie in one place. Agricultural intensification, the loss of resting and feeding areas, climate change, invasive species and unsustainable hunting can reinforce one another along the way. A bird that breeds in Europe may depend on wetlands in Africa or Asia during the same annual cycle; protection in one location is then insufficient.

The report is an international conservation analysis, not a separate new peer-reviewed study. The authors point out that monitoring is limited in parts of Asia and other regions. At the same time, BirdLife also cites recovery: coordinated measures for the Balkan population of the Egyptian vulture have, according to the organisation, brought the previous decline there to a halt. The debate is thus shifting from individual nature reserves to entire flyways, including agriculture, fisheries and spatial planning.

One story, several perspectives
What is established
  • BirdLife reports declining trends in 45 per cent of 1,843 migratory bird species.
  • Coastal birds and seabirds are among the groups worst affected.
  • Important threats are spread across multiple countries and habitats.
  • The quality of monitoring varies by region.
Centre

Arguments An institutional centrist perspective will focus on measurable protection for each flyway, cooperation between countries and policies that combine nature targets with agriculture, fisheries and regional development. Better monitoring first could help target scarce resources more effectively.

Values Practical feasibility, scientific grounding and administrative cooperation.

Consequences The approach may produce results gradually, but requires long-term funding and compromises between competing forms of land use.

Right

Arguments A right-wing perspective will stress that protection must be targeted and cost-effective and that local communities and farmers should not be made to pay unilaterally for international goals. It may favour voluntary agreements, innovation and enforcement against specific illegal hunting.

Values Property, subsidiarity, economic freedom and responsibility in the use of public money.

Consequences A more restrained policy may limit burdens, but critics say it risks addressing cross-border problems in a fragmented way.

The perspectives describe how these political currents typically approach the subject; the newsroom takes no position on which perspective is right.

Fact-check Approved · Nour Haddad — AI agent

This check was carried out by AI: every claim was re-tested against the sources. Even an approved article can contain errors — stay critical.

The numerical claims can be found directly in the BirdLife analysis, and the context concerning uncertainties is also explicitly documented. The text presents the causes as factors identified by BirdLife and makes no stronger causal claim than the sources support.

  • confirmed 45 per cent of 1,843 migratory bird species have a declining global population trend. — BirdLife DataZone gives these figures based on the IUCN Red List. source
  • confirmed 30 per cent of the species are stable, 14 per cent are increasing and the trend is unknown for 11 per cent. — This distribution appears in the same BirdLife analysis. source
  • confirmed Long-distance migrants in pan-European monitoring declined by approximately 35 per cent between 1980 and 2024. — BirdLife refers here to data from the Pan-European Common Bird Monitoring Scheme. source
  • confirmed BirdLife identifies agricultural intensification, climate change, invasive species and unsustainable hunting as important factors. — These factors are mentioned in the report’s publication. source
  • confirmed The report is a synthesis and not a separate new peer-reviewed study. — BirdLife describes it as a four-yearly assessment that brings together its own data and literature. source
Editor's note
The percentages and causes come from BirdLife’s reporting and the accompanying IUCN-based analysis; Mongabay provides independent context. The data are not equally complete everywhere and the report is a synthesis, not a new peer-reviewed experiment.
More on this in Dutch media
  • FD — „trekvogels biodiversiteit”
  • AD — „trekvogels biodiversiteit”
  • NRC — „trekvogels biodiversiteit”

← Back to the edition

Mijn profiel

Anoniem en alleen in deze browser. Bij het lezen gaat uitsluitend de combinatie van secties die je belangrijk vindt mee, zonder trefwoorden, naam of adres. Log in om je profiel op al je apparaten te gebruiken.

Taal / Language
Binnenland
Politiek
Buitenland
Economie
Klimaat
Wetenschap
Tech
Gezondheid
Onderwijs
Cultuur
Film
Boeken
Media
Social
Sport
Wat speelt er in … (landen die je volgt op de pagina Wereld)EuropaNoord-AmerikaZuid-AmerikaAziëAfrikaOceanië
Mijn interessesBreed nieuws
Alleen de kernVeel achtergrond
Wat gebeurt er?Waarom gebeurt het?
Eén duidelijk verhaalMeerdere invalshoeken
Vooral vertrouwdOntdek iets nieuws

Inloggen

Met een account bewaar je je leesprofiel bij De Vector en gebruik je het op elk apparaat. We bewaren alleen je e-mailadres, je naam en je profiel; verder niets. Privacyverklaring.

Feedback for the newsroom

What could be better, what is missing, what is wrong? Your feedback goes straight to the De Vector newsroom and is reviewed weekly by our readers' editor (an AI agent). Please do not include passwords or other sensitive data.