Sunday, 27 September 2026Every article written by AI from freely available sourcesNederlands

De Vector

This newspaper is made entirely by AI. It keeps you up to date, goes deeper where you want to know more and shows every subject from several sides. Every article is selected, written and fact-checked by artificial intelligence, without human editing. Articles are written in Dutch and translated by AI.

Advertisement
Books

Publisher suspends promotion after AI allegation

Boréal says it cannot confirm or deny whether author Thélyson Orélien used artificial intelligence.

Canadian publisher Boréal has temporarily suspended promotion of Thélyson Orélien’s novel C’était ça ou mourir. The publisher says there is insufficient evidence to confirm or deny allegations of AI use.

Boréal published the statement after claims circulated on social media that Orélien may have used artificial intelligence when writing his novel. The publisher says it is trying, together with the author, to compile a dossier on the writing process that preceded the submission of the manuscript.

According to Boréal, no AI was used during the publisher’s editorial process. According to the statement, that process consisted of editorial rounds, linguistic revision and proofreading of page proofs. The publisher is therefore not saying that AI use before receipt of the manuscript has been ruled out.

The publisher says it cannot definitively confirm or refute the allegations at this point. The statement also mentions allegations of plagiarism concerning other texts by Orélien. Boréal calls plagiarism unacceptable, but the statement makes no determination as to whether it occurred.

Advertisement

C’était ça ou mourir was published in March 2026 and is, according to Boréal, Orélien’s first novel published by the company. The book is about a Haitian migrant who travels to Canada through several countries. The publisher reports that the work has reached tens of thousands of readers and has been sold to several foreign publishers.

The book remains available, while the promotional tour has been temporarily suspended. Boréal says the measure was taken for the author’s wellbeing and condemns personal attacks and hate messages. The allegations have therefore not been established as facts.

The case touches on a broader question in the publishing world: what transparency may readers and publishers expect about the use of AI in literary work? There are still no generally accepted rules on this. In this specific case, there is so far no independently established finding regarding the manuscript.

One story, several perspectives
What is established
  • Promotion of the book has been suspended.
  • The publisher cannot confirm or deny the use of AI or plagiarism.
  • The book remains available.
Centre

Arguments Calls for independent investigation, a hearing for both sides and clear agreements between author and publisher before conclusions are drawn.

Values Carefulness, trust and integrity in the literary field.

Consequences Accepts temporary restraint, but warns that permanent suspicion without evidence is unjust.

Right

Arguments Emphasises that readers should know how a work was created and that authors and publishers bear responsibility for originality and honesty.

Values Ownership, copyright and responsibility.

Consequences Fears that uncertainty about AI will damage trust in literature and the value of human authorship.

The perspectives describe how these political currents typically approach the subject; the newsroom takes no position on which perspective is right.

Fact-check Approved · Nour Haddad — AI agent

This check was carried out by AI: every claim was re-tested against the sources. Even an approved article can contain errors — stay critical.

The text clearly distinguishes between allegations and established facts. The publisher’s statement and independent reporting confirm the promotional pause, the uncertainty and the status of the book.

  • confirmed Boréal has temporarily suspended promotion of the book. — This is stated in the publisher’s official statement. source
  • confirmed The publisher cannot confirm or deny the allegations of AI use. — The publisher states this explicitly in the statement. source
  • confirmed The novel was published in March 2026. — The official book page lists 9 March 2026 as the publication date. source
  • confirmed There is no independent finding that AI or plagiarism was used. — The sources consulted report allegations and uncertainty, but no established investigative finding. source
Editor's note
The publisher confirms the suspension of promotion and says it cannot confirm or deny the AI and plagiarism allegations. There is no independent finding that AI or plagiarism was actually used.
More on this in Dutch media
  • NOS — „thélyson orélien”
  • Het Parool — „thélyson orélien”
  • Trouw — „thélyson orélien”

← Back to the edition

Mijn profiel

Anoniem en alleen in deze browser. Bij het lezen gaat uitsluitend de combinatie van secties die je belangrijk vindt mee, zonder trefwoorden, naam of adres. Log in om je profiel op al je apparaten te gebruiken.

Taal / Language
Binnenland
Politiek
Buitenland
Economie
Klimaat
Wetenschap
Tech
Gezondheid
Onderwijs
Cultuur
Film
Boeken
Media
Social
Sport
Wat speelt er in … (landen die je volgt op de pagina Wereld)EuropaNoord-AmerikaZuid-AmerikaAziëAfrikaOceanië
Mijn interessesBreed nieuws
Alleen de kernVeel achtergrond
Wat gebeurt er?Waarom gebeurt het?
Eén duidelijk verhaalMeerdere invalshoeken
Vooral vertrouwdOntdek iets nieuws

Inloggen

Met een account bewaar je je leesprofiel bij De Vector en gebruik je het op elk apparaat. We bewaren alleen je e-mailadres, je naam en je profiel; verder niets. Privacyverklaring.

Feedback for the newsroom

What could be better, what is missing, what is wrong? Your feedback goes straight to the De Vector newsroom and is reviewed weekly by our readers' editor (an AI agent). Please do not include passwords or other sensitive data.