China plans to classify universities by their social role
A new reform plan distinguishes between research, applied programmes and skills education.
China wants to distinguish universities more clearly according to their role: research, applied programmes or skills education. A new party and government document also seeks to align assessment, funding and links with the labour market accordingly, but does not promise that everyone can attend university without selection.
The document was published on 20 September by the Central Committee of the Communist Party and the State Council. It says universities should no longer be developed according to a single general model. Institutions should present themselves, for example, as research universities, applied institutions or providers of skilled vocational education. A distinction is also made between broad-based and specialised institutions.
According to the text, the reform should lead to different development paths and assessment systems. Research universities will mainly play a role in scientific innovation and national strategic objectives. Applied universities should work more closely with regional economies and businesses. Higher vocational institutions should focus on practical training and the availability of qualified staff.
China also wants to change how institutions are assessed and funded. The plan refers to multiple assessment routes, different assessors and funding that better suits the type of institution. Courses and fields of study should also be adapted more quickly to demand for workers and to national priorities.
The announcement comes after Chinese higher education has expanded significantly. According to the Chinese government, 61.3 per cent of the relevant age group had access to higher education in 2025; the total number of enrolled students was 48.73 million. On 23 September, the ministry also reported that 270 million Chinese people now have a higher-education background.
Greater access does not mean that differences between institutions have disappeared. UNESCO writes that the number of students in Chinese higher education was approximately 61 million in 2024, but also points to continuing differences between urban and rural areas. In an analysis of data from 2015, urban students were 2.3 times as likely to be admitted to a better university as students from rural areas.
The reform plan therefore also refers to a different distribution of recognition and resources. Universities within the so-called Double First-Class programme will receive a combined 76,000 additional undergraduate places between 2027 and 2030. At the same time, the document says that applied and vocationally oriented institutions must also be strengthened. Exactly how institutions will be classified and how funding will change for each category has not yet been worked out.
The essence of the reform is therefore not a general opening-up of universities, but a restructuring of the system. Supporters may see it as an attempt to align education more closely with work and regional development. Critics will watch to see whether the new categories nevertheless become a new hierarchy in practice, with some institutions retaining structurally greater prestige and resources.
One story, several perspectives
What is established
- China has published an official reform plan seeking to classify universities according to different social and educational objectives.
- The plan refers to revised assessment, funding and the alignment of courses with national and regional needs.
- Participation in higher education has grown significantly, but UNESCO describes continuing differences between urban and rural students.
- The announced reform does not automatically end selection or differences in prestige between institutions.
Left
Arguments A left-wing approach will mainly ask whether differentiation genuinely makes opportunities more equal. Universities and vocational institutions must receive sufficient public funding, so that a practical course does not become a second-class route and background or place of residence remains less decisive.
Values Equality, social mobility, public accessibility and protection against institutional hierarchies.
Consequences If the new categories mainly favour existing elite universities, regional and rural differences may widen. A fair reform therefore requires transparent standards and additional support for institutions and students with fewer resources.
Centre
Arguments The institutional approach can recognise different educational objectives without automatically placing them above or below one another. Research, applied knowledge and vocational skills each require their own benchmarks, but basic quality and independent oversight must apply everywhere.
Values Effectiveness, equal treatment, quality and administrative feasibility.
Consequences A more differentiated system could align courses more closely with students and the labour market, provided classification does not become a hidden new league table and institutions can adjust course.
Right
Arguments A right-wing approach will emphasise that higher education is not only about qualifications or prestige, but also about productivity, national competitiveness and employers’ needs. Universities should be given room to specialise, and public money must produce demonstrable results.
Values Responsibility, efficiency, craftsmanship, economic growth and strategic independence.
Consequences A closer link to the labour market and industry could reduce shortages of technical and practical skills. The risk is that courses with less immediate economic return will systematically receive less space.
The perspectives describe how these political currents typically approach the subject; the newsroom takes no position on which perspective is right.
Fact-check Approved · Nour Haddad — AI agent
This check was carried out by AI: every claim was re-tested against the sources. Even an approved article can contain errors — stay critical.
The main facts can be found directly in official Chinese publications and the UNESCO country study. The text clearly distinguishes between announced policy, existing figures and implementation that has not yet been worked out.
- confirmed China published a plan on 20 September 2026 to reform universities by category. — Mentioned in the publication of the Chinese Ministry of Education and Xinhua. source
- confirmed The plan distinguishes between research, applied programmes and skills education, and also mentions broad-based and specialised institutions. — This is stated in the description of the reform framework. source
- confirmed The plan provides for different assessment routes, multiple assessors and an adjusted allocation of resources. — The ministry refers to classification management, multi-track assessment and incentives for resource allocation. source
- confirmed Participation in higher education was 61.3 per cent in 2025 and the number of enrolled students was 48.73 million. — These figures were reported by the Chinese Ministry of Education on 23 September. source
- confirmed According to the government, 270 million Chinese people had a higher-education background. — Figure from the government announcement of 23 September 2026. source
- confirmed Universities within the Double First-Class programme will receive a combined 76,000 additional undergraduate places between 2027 and 2030. — Mentioned during the same press conference by the Chinese ministry. source
- confirmed UNESCO reports approximately 61 million students in Chinese higher education in 2024. — UNESCO bases this on Chinese statistical data. source
- confirmed In an analysis of data from 2015, urban students were 2.3 times as likely to be admitted to a better university as rural students. — This comparison is cited by UNESCO from research based on the Chinese General Social Survey. source
- confirmed The reform plan does not guarantee that everyone will gain access to university without selection. — The published text concerns classification, assessment, funding and links with the labour market; it does not contain a general automatic admissions guarantee. source
Editor's note
It is certain that China has published an official plan for differentiated university reform and that participation in higher education has grown significantly. It remains uncertain how the categories, funding and assessment criteria will be applied nationwide; the plan contains no concrete implementation timetable.Sources
- Opinions on Advancing University Reform by Category — Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China
- New arrangements issued to advance university reform by category — Xinhua
- China’s population with higher education reaches 270 million — State Council of the People’s Republic of China
- China: 2026 GEM Report — Access and equity — UNESCO
More on this in Dutch media
- NRC — „china hoger onderwijs”
- NU.nl — „china hoger onderwijs”
- De Telegraaf — „china hoger onderwijs”