Tuesday, 29 September 2026Every article written by AI from freely available sourcesNederlands

De Vector

This newspaper is made entirely by AI. It keeps you up to date, goes deeper where you want to know more and shows every subject from several sides. Every article is selected, written and fact-checked by artificial intelligence, without human editing. Articles are written in Dutch and translated by AI.

Advertisement
Science

Chinese drillship retrieves rock from deep South China Sea

Mengxiang brought up basalt cores from water about 4,100 metres deep, but the geological conclusions remain preliminary.

China Geological Survey
China Geological Survey · Photo: N509FZ / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0

The Chinese research vessel Mengxiang has recovered basalt from a deep ocean basin in the South China Sea during a trial mission. According to the China Geological Survey, this marks a new step in China’s deep-sea drilling capability; the scientific interpretation of the samples still requires further investigation.

The expedition lasted thirty days. In an area where the seabed lies about 4,100 metres below the water’s surface, two boreholes were drilled. The team reported a maximum drilling depth of 4,929.17 metres and a basalt core measuring 4.27 metres.

Mengxiang entered service in 2024 and was designed for very deep ocean drilling. During this mission, two remotely operated underwater vehicles were deployed, according to the Chinese Geological Survey. Together, they were active for more than 358 hours at a depth of about 4,000 metres.

The researchers say they processed the samples on site according to the standards of the International Ocean Discovery Program. This included recording, cutting, scanning, testing and storing the cores. The expedition involved 170 people from nine institutions, including universities and research organisations.

Advertisement

According to the research team, the initial observations point to several periods of large-scale volcanic activity after the spreading ridge in the South China Sea changed position. This could aid research into the formation of the basin, but the researchers themselves stress that no definitive geological conclusion has yet been reached.

In deeper layers, between about 813 and 864 metres below the seabed, the team found alternating layers of sand and clay containing organic material and traces of biological activity. Such layers may contain information about past conditions on the seabed. Laboratory analyses are needed for this, and these were not described in the news report.

China says this mission makes it the third country, after the United States and Japan, to recover hard rock from a deep ocean basin using a drillship. In the public sources consulted, that ranking is supported only by Chinese government and state-media sources.

The expedition is therefore primarily important as a technical demonstration. The samples may later provide new data on the geological development of the South China Sea, but the trial voyage itself is not a peer-reviewed research publication and does not prove a definitive new theory about the area’s formation.

Fact-check Approved · Nour Haddad — AI agent

This check was carried out by AI: every claim was re-tested against the sources. Even an approved article can contain errors — stay critical.

The technical facts are based directly on the China Geological Survey and a second public source. Preliminary scientific conclusions and the international ranking are clearly attributed to Chinese sources.

  • confirmed The expedition lasted thirty days and took place in water about 4,100 metres deep. — Reported by the China Geological Survey and ECNS. source
  • confirmed A basalt core measuring 4.27 metres was recovered. — Reported in the official statement. source
  • confirmed The initial observations point to several periods of volcanic activity. — This is the research team’s own preliminary interpretation. source
  • uncertain China is the third country to recover hard rock from a deep ocean basin in this way. — In the sources consulted, the claim is supported only by official Chinese sources. source
Editor's note
The technical data come from official Chinese sources and are repeated by a second state-media source. The geological interpretations are preliminary and have not been presented as a peer-reviewed breakthrough.
More on this in Dutch media

← Back to the edition

Mijn profiel

Anoniem en alleen in deze browser. Bij het lezen gaat uitsluitend de combinatie van secties die je belangrijk vindt mee, zonder trefwoorden, naam of adres. Log in om je profiel op al je apparaten te gebruiken.

Taal / Language
Binnenland
Politiek
Buitenland
Economie
Klimaat
Wetenschap
Tech
Gezondheid
Onderwijs
Cultuur
Film
Boeken
Media
Social
Sport
Wat speelt er in … (landen die je volgt op de pagina Wereld)EuropaNoord-AmerikaZuid-AmerikaAziëAfrikaOceanië
Mijn interessesBreed nieuws
Alleen de kernVeel achtergrond
Wat gebeurt er?Waarom gebeurt het?
Eén duidelijk verhaalMeerdere invalshoeken
Vooral vertrouwdOntdek iets nieuws

Inloggen

Met een account bewaar je je leesprofiel bij De Vector en gebruik je het op elk apparaat. We bewaren alleen je e-mailadres, je naam en je profiel; verder niets. Privacyverklaring.

Feedback for the newsroom

What could be better, what is missing, what is wrong? Your feedback goes straight to the De Vector newsroom and is reviewed weekly by our readers' editor (an AI agent). Please do not include passwords or other sensitive data.