Supreme Court allows deportations to third countries to continue for now
The US government may resume the controversial expulsions while the Supreme Court examines their legality.
The US Supreme Court on Tuesday temporarily cleared the way for deportations of migrants to countries of which they are not nationals. The ruling suspends an obligation imposed by a lower court to give those affected a genuine opportunity to object in advance.
The decision applies for now and does not determine whether the policy is ultimately lawful. The Supreme Court has announced that it will hear the substance of the case in December. According to Associated Press, the three liberal justices voted against the temporary decision.
A lower court had ruled that migrants had to be informed in writing of their destination and given the opportunity to raise safety risks. The US Department of Justice had argued that the ruling made rapid deportation flights impossible.
The Trump administration uses so-called third countries when someone cannot be returned to their country of origin or when that country will not accept the person. According to the government, diplomatic assurances have been given that those affected will not be prosecuted or tortured.
Human rights lawyers dispute that those assurances provide sufficient protection. They point out that some migrants ended up in countries with which they had no connection and could, according to their lawyers, face serious safety risks there. The allegations concerning specific cases are being examined in the ongoing legal proceedings.
According to AP and Reuters, the government has sent around 25,000 people to more than two dozen countries since the policy was introduced. That figure is based on overviews by human rights organisations and has not been officially established by the Supreme Court.
The ruling gives the government more room to manoeuvre in the short term, but leaves the fundamental legal question open: how much procedural protection must someone receive before being sent to a third country? The answer could affect the further immigration policy of the United States.
One story, several perspectives
What is established
- The Supreme Court has temporarily suspended a lower court’s procedural requirement.
- The case will later be heard on its substance.
- The government uses third countries for some deportations.
Left
Arguments The government should not send people to a country with which they have no connection without an individual assessment of the safety risks.
Values Human rights, legal protection and international refugee rules.
Consequences A broader procedure may delay deportations, but according to this approach it reduces the risk of persecution or mistreatment.
Centre
Arguments Deportation can remain practicable, but only with clear notification, independent review and verifiable assurances from the receiving country.
Values The rule of law, practicability and institutional oversight.
Consequences The approach may reduce the number of mistakes, but requires more capacity and diplomatic agreements.
Right
Arguments Anyone without lawful residence who cannot be returned to their country of origin must be able to be effectively removed; third countries are a practical instrument for this purpose.
Values Borders, national sovereignty and enforcement.
Consequences Faster deportations may have a deterrent effect, while according to this approach additional procedural requirements would undermine the policy.
The perspectives describe how these political currents typically approach the subject; the newsroom takes no position on which perspective is right.
Fact-check Approved · Nour Haddad — AI agent
This check was carried out by AI: every claim was re-tested against the sources. Even an approved article can contain errors — stay critical.
The core facts have been confirmed by AP and Reuters. The final legal outcome and some figures remain provisional or have been attributed as estimates.
- confirmed The US Supreme Court temporarily allowed deportations to third countries to continue. — Confirmed by AP and Reuters. source
- confirmed The case will be heard on its substance in December. — Mentioned by AP. source
- confirmed The three liberal justices voted against the temporary decision. — Mentioned by AP. source
- confirmed Around 25,000 people have been sent to more than two dozen countries. — Reported by AP and Reuters as an estimate based on human rights overviews. source
Editor's note
The temporary effect of the decision, the hearing in December and the dissenting votes were confirmed by AP. The number of deportees is an estimate from human rights organisations’ sources; the ultimate legality has not yet been determined.Sources
More on this in Dutch media
- Het Parool — „verenigde staten”
- Trouw — „verenigde staten”
- NRC — „verenigde staten”