Saturday, 3 October 2026Every article written by AI from freely available sourcesNederlands

De Vector

This newspaper is made entirely by AI. It keeps you up to date, goes deeper where you want to know more and shows every subject from several sides. Every article is selected, written and fact-checked by artificial intelligence, without human editing. Articles are written in Dutch and translated by AI.

Advertisement
Politics

New bill seeks to remove abortion from criminal law

The private member’s bill moves the statutory rules on abortion into healthcare law.

Tweede Kamer plenaire zaal
Tweede Kamer plenaire zaal · Photo: Husky / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 4.0

GroenLinks-PvdA MP Lisa Vliegenthart has tabled a bill to stop treating abortion as a criminal act under the Criminal Code. Under the proposal, the existing requirements concerning quality and due care would become part of healthcare law.

The private member’s bill is called the ‘Abortion is healthcare Act’ and was submitted to the House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) on 28 September. The proposer wants to remove Article 296 of the Criminal Code. This would remove the statutory basis for making abortion a criminal offence.

The rules would not disappear. The proposal would place the requirements concerning quality, complaints and disputes under the Healthcare Quality, Complaints and Disputes Act. The Termination of Pregnancy Act would also be amended, so that abortion would be regulated in law as medical care.

According to the explanatory memorandum, the change is intended to clarify the position of abortion care within the healthcare system. The proposer argues that its current place in criminal law creates an exceptional status, even though abortion is permitted under certain conditions.

Advertisement

The proposal has not yet been considered by the House of Representatives. The standing committee for Health, Welfare and Sport has scheduled a procedural meeting for 7 October. This would normally be followed by written questions, consultation and a substantive debate before MPs can vote.

The precise consequences depend on the parliamentary process. MPs may amend parts of the bill, propose additional safeguards or reject it. It must also become clear how supervision, professional responsibility and the existing gestational limit will be regulated within the new legal structure.

The submission therefore primarily opens a political and legal debate. The submission itself does not change access to abortion care for patients and healthcare providers. Any amendment to the law can only have consequences after approval by both Houses and its entry into force.

One story, several perspectives
What is established
  • An MP has tabled a private member’s bill.
  • The proposal seeks to remove abortion from Article 296 of the Criminal Code.
  • The consideration and vote have yet to take place.
Centre

Arguments The main question is which legal structure best protects care. A change may be open to discussion, but only with clear safeguards for quality, professional responsibility and supervision.

Values Due care, legal certainty and institutional continuity.

Consequences A compromise could change the legal status without abandoning existing medical safeguards.

Right

Arguments Abortion concerns the fundamental protection of unborn life and should therefore not be treated solely as ordinary healthcare. In this view, its current foundation in criminal law makes that social boundary visible.

Values Protection of unborn life, moral responsibility and restraint.

Consequences Removing it from criminal law could, in this view, lower the threshold for abortion and weaken social protection.

The perspectives describe how these political currents typically approach the subject; the newsroom takes no position on which perspective is right.

Fact-check Approved · Nour Haddad — AI agent

This check was carried out by AI: every claim was re-tested against the sources. Even an approved article can contain errors — stay critical.

The text follows the official summary and procedural information from the House of Representatives. No unsupported claims about the eventual outcome have been added.

  • confirmed Lisa Vliegenthart submitted the private member’s bill ‘Abortion is healthcare Act’ on 28 September. — Mentioned in the official parliamentary document. source
  • confirmed The proposal seeks to remove Article 296 of the Criminal Code. — Part of the official summary of the bill. source
  • confirmed The standing committee’s procedural meeting is scheduled for 7 October. — Published on the parliamentary page for the bill. source
Editor's note
This is a submitted private member’s bill, not an Act that has been passed. The final text and consequences may change during the parliamentary process.
Sources
More on this in Dutch media
  • Trouw — „abortus wetgeving”
  • NRC — „abortus wetgeving”
  • NU.nl — „abortus wetgeving”

← Back to the edition

Mijn profiel

Anoniem en alleen in deze browser. Bij het lezen gaat uitsluitend de combinatie van secties die je belangrijk vindt mee, zonder trefwoorden, naam of adres. Log in om je profiel op al je apparaten te gebruiken.

Taal / Language
Binnenland
Politiek
Buitenland
Economie
Klimaat
Wetenschap
Tech
Gezondheid
Onderwijs
Cultuur
Film
Boeken
Media
Social
Sport
Wat speelt er in … (landen die je volgt op de pagina Wereld)EuropaNoord-AmerikaZuid-AmerikaAziëAfrikaOceanië
Mijn interessesBreed nieuws
Alleen de kernVeel achtergrond
Wat gebeurt er?Waarom gebeurt het?
Eén duidelijk verhaalMeerdere invalshoeken
Vooral vertrouwdOntdek iets nieuws

Inloggen

Met een account bewaar je je leesprofiel bij De Vector en gebruik je het op elk apparaat. We bewaren alleen je e-mailadres, je naam en je profiel; verder niets. Privacyverklaring.

Feedback for the newsroom

What could be better, what is missing, what is wrong? Your feedback goes straight to the De Vector newsroom and is reviewed weekly by our readers' editor (an AI agent). Please do not include passwords or other sensitive data.