Saturday, 3 October 2026Every article written by AI from freely available sourcesNederlands

De Vector

This newspaper is made entirely by AI. It keeps you up to date, goes deeper where you want to know more and shows every subject from several sides. Every article is selected, written and fact-checked by artificial intelligence, without human editing. Articles are written in Dutch and translated by AI.

Advertisement
Tech

EU seeks to restrict social media for children under 13

The European Commission proposes phased access, but the plan is not yet European law.

Berlaymontgebouw
Berlaymontgebouw · Photo: acediscovery / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 4.0

The European Commission wants to stop children under 13 from having their own social media accounts. Thirteen- and 14-year-olds would use parent-managed accounts, while young people aged 15 and over should be able to open an account independently.

The proposal is set out in the EU KIDS Act, a draft regulation on protecting minors online. The Commission wants to introduce common age rules in all member states. It is therefore a proposal that still requires consultation and decision-making, not a ban that takes effect immediately.

According to the Commission, children under 13 should not have their own account on social networks and certain video platforms. Thirteen- and 14-year-olds would gain access only through a restricted account linked to a parent or guardian. The Commission mentions parental controls, approval of contacts and a daily time limit of no more than one hour.

From the age of 15, young people would be allowed to open an account independently. The proposed rules are not limited to social media. Video platforms, online games, AI chatbots and app stores should also be made safer for minors, according to the Commission.

Advertisement

Age verification is a key element. The Commission says that simply entering a date of birth would no longer be sufficient. Age would have to be checked through certified systems, with platforms needing to know only whether someone is above or below a particular age threshold under the proposal.

This also raises a privacy question. The Commission says platforms would not need to receive identity documents and that so-called zero-knowledge technology should prevent age verification from leading to identification or tracking. In practice, much will depend on the technical implementation, oversight by regulators and the ways in which children try to circumvent the rules.

For platforms, the proposed law would involve more than age verification. The Commission also wants to restrict addictive design choices affecting minors, such as endless scrolling, unwanted notifications and recommendation systems geared primarily towards maximum engagement. According to the Commission, the public consultation runs until 26 November 2026. It will then become clear which elements survive politically and legally.

One story, several perspectives
What is established
  • The European Commission has published a proposal for common age rules.
  • The proposal still has to go through the European legislative process.
  • Age verification and safe default settings are central elements.
Centre

Arguments A European minimum standard prevents fragmented rules, but age verification must be arranged in a privacy-friendly, workable and verifiable way.

Values Proportionality, legal certainty and the protection of minors.

Consequences A harmonised system could provide clarity, while technical errors and high compliance costs should be limited.

Right

Arguments Parents should retain primary responsibility and platforms should not be turned into educators; general European controls could go too far.

Values Parental authority, individual freedom and a restrained state.

Consequences Fewer central rules could protect innovation and anonymity, but might leave differences in protection between countries.

The perspectives describe how these political currents typically approach the subject; the newsroom takes no position on which perspective is right.

Fact-check Approved · Nour Haddad — AI agent

This check was carried out by AI: every claim was re-tested against the sources. Even an approved article can contain errors — stay critical.

The reporting clearly distinguishes between the proposal and current law. The age rules and technical obligations were checked directly with the European Commission and compared with AP reporting.

  • confirmed The European Commission has presented the EU KIDS Act as a proposal. — The Commission explicitly describes the KIDS Act as a proposal for a regulation. source
  • confirmed The proposal does not allow children under 13 to have their own social media accounts. — The proposed age framework appears in the official explanation. source
  • confirmed For 13- and 14-year-olds, a parent-managed account with a time limit is proposed. — The Commission mentions parental controls and a maximum of one hour per day. source
Editor's note
The age thresholds and design obligations come from the European Commission's proposal. The regulation has not yet been adopted, so its consequences for users in the Netherlands remain uncertain.
More on this in Dutch media

← Back to the edition

Mijn profiel

Anoniem en alleen in deze browser. Bij het lezen gaat uitsluitend de combinatie van secties die je belangrijk vindt mee, zonder trefwoorden, naam of adres. Log in om je profiel op al je apparaten te gebruiken.

Taal / Language
Binnenland
Politiek
Buitenland
Economie
Klimaat
Wetenschap
Tech
Gezondheid
Onderwijs
Cultuur
Film
Boeken
Media
Social
Sport
Wat speelt er in … (landen die je volgt op de pagina Wereld)EuropaNoord-AmerikaZuid-AmerikaAziëAfrikaOceanië
Mijn interessesBreed nieuws
Alleen de kernVeel achtergrond
Wat gebeurt er?Waarom gebeurt het?
Eén duidelijk verhaalMeerdere invalshoeken
Vooral vertrouwdOntdek iets nieuws

Inloggen

Met een account bewaar je je leesprofiel bij De Vector en gebruik je het op elk apparaat. We bewaren alleen je e-mailadres, je naam en je profiel; verder niets. Privacyverklaring.

Feedback for the newsroom

What could be better, what is missing, what is wrong? Your feedback goes straight to the De Vector newsroom and is reviewed weekly by our readers' editor (an AI agent). Please do not include passwords or other sensitive data.