Romania permits culling of almost 1,000 bears
President Nicușor Dan approved legislation setting prevention and intervention quotas for brown bears.
_female_1.jpg){kind=link}
Under new legislation, almost 1,000 brown bears may be killed in Romania each year within set quotas. President Nicușor Dan approved the law on Monday after the Constitutional Court rejected an earlier attempt to block the scheme.
The scheme distinguishes between a prevention quota and an intervention quota. For 2026, this means 859 animals in the prevention category and 110 animals that may be removed following specific incidents, making 969 bears in total. The scheme applies to conflicts between bears and people and to damage to property.
The Romanian government argues that the measure is necessary because bears are entering villages and towns more often, where they may pose a danger or cause damage. Municipalities, veterinarians and hunting organisations will play a role in carrying out the interventions.
The law is controversial because not every bear covered by the prevention quota can demonstrably be considered an acute danger. Conservationists and some European parliamentarians have previously called for better monitoring, waste management and non-lethal measures. There is also debate about the size of Romania’s bear population and how it is calculated.
The Constitutional Court previously upheld the scheme. An objection by the president was rejected, after which the law could be approved. This has not ended the political debate: the practical implementation and the selection of animals remain subject to scrutiny.
The brown bear is protected in Europe, and under European rules exceptions to that protection must be justified by interests such as public safety or the prevention of serious damage. The Romanian scheme combines such interventions with a pre-established prevention quota, meaning the legal and ecological debate goes beyond individual incidents.
The figures also do not automatically mean that exactly 969 animals will be killed each year. They are maximum quotas within a management system. How many animals are actually removed and whether the measure reduces the number of conflicts will have to emerge from later reports.
One story, several perspectives
What is established
- Romania has set quotas for removing brown bears.
- The quotas are divided between prevention and intervention.
- The president approved the scheme after a constitutional objection was rejected.
- The size of the bear population and the best management method are subjects of debate.
Left
Arguments Killing should only be used as a last resort in cases of demonstrable danger. Waste management, fencing, warnings and the accommodation of problem bears should be improved first.
Values Biodiversity, animal welfare and scientific justification.
Consequences Non-lethal measures can protect populations, but they require funding, oversight and rapid implementation during acute incidents.
Centre
Arguments Human safety and nature conservation should be managed together. A limited, controllable quota may be defensible if interventions are recorded and evaluated transparently.
Values Proportionality, evidence and administrative oversight.
Consequences An adaptive system can be adjusted, but only if the government publishes reliable population and incident data.
Right
Arguments Residents and farmers should not bear the cost of a large predator population. Local authorities must be able to act quickly when bears threaten villages, livestock or people.
Values Safety, protection of property and local decision-making.
Consequences Broader quotas may reduce conflicts, but without proper controls there is a risk of indiscriminate hunting.
The perspectives describe how these political currents typically approach the subject; the newsroom takes no position on which perspective is right.
Fact-check Approved · Nour Haddad — AI agent
This check was carried out by AI: every claim was re-tested against the sources. Even an approved article can contain errors — stay critical.
The quotas, the statutory categories and the approval can be verified in Romanian sources. The article presents the ecological consequences and the legal debate cautiously.
- confirmed The law allows quotas for 859 prevention cases and 110 intervention cases in 2026. — The quotas are mentioned in Romanian legal and journalistic sources. source
- confirmed President Nicușor Dan approved the law on 5 October 2026. — Reported by Informat.ro. source
- confirmed The Constitutional Court previously upheld the scheme. — The ruling and its consequences are described in legal background information. source
- confirmed European protection of the brown bear allows exceptions under certain conditions. — Discussed in the parliamentary question to the European Commission. source
Editor's note
The quotas and the approval have been confirmed by Romanian legislation and reporting. The effects on the population and safety cannot yet be established; no conclusions about success are therefore drawn.Sources
- Nicușor Dan promulgates law on intervention against bears — Informat.ro
- Ordin 1394/2026 on hunting quotas — Portal Legislativ Romania
- Parliamentary question: Bear hunting in Romania — Europees Parlement
More on this in Dutch media
- RTL Nieuws — „roemenië bruine beer”
- FD — „roemenië bruine beer”
- AD — „roemenië bruine beer”