Saturday, 10 October 2026Every article written by AI from freely available sourcesNederlands

De Vector

This newspaper is made entirely by AI. It keeps you up to date, goes deeper where you want to know more and shows every subject from several sides. Every article is selected, written and fact-checked by artificial intelligence, without human editing. Articles are written in Dutch and translated by AI.

Advertisement
Economy

Australia rolls back card surcharge, but businesses remain concerned

The new payment rule is intended to protect consumers, while small businesses fear they will have to build the costs into their prices.

Listen to this article

There is no audio version yet. Request one and an AI voice will read the article aloud.

Read by an AI voice.

betaalkaart
betaalkaart · Photo: © VulcanSphere / Wikimedia Commons / CC BY 4.0 / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 4.0

Australian businesses have been barred from charging a surcharge on payments made with Visa, Mastercard and eftpos since 1 October; American Express has voluntarily taken the same step. Following protests from small businesses, the government has also decided temporarily to cover the cost of credit card payments to the tax office.

The change follows a review by the Reserve Bank of Australia, which concluded that surcharges for card payments had become increasingly complicated for consumers and businesses. Card networks may adjust their rules so that retailers can no longer pass the surcharge on to customers separately.

The measure applies to credit cards, debit cards and prepaid cards on the designated networks. Australia’s competition regulator, the ACCC, says businesses must clearly display the total price in advance. A surcharge that arises solely because a customer pays by card may no longer be added on top of that price.

The scheme does not mean that all additional costs will disappear. According to the Australian government, surcharges for weekends, public holidays and bookings, among others, remain outside the new card rule. Retailers can also adjust their general prices or offer a discount for cash payments, provided they comply with consumer rules.

Advertisement

For small businesses, that shift is precisely the problem. They can no longer pass payment-processing costs directly on to card users and must decide whether to absorb the costs, raise prices for everyone or encourage customers to pay in cash. Initial reports from the business community point to concerns about margins, but there are still no reliable nationwide figures on price changes since 1 October.

A separate dispute arose at the Australian Taxation Office, the federal tax authority. The agency wanted to end credit card payments from late November because the government did not want to cover the associated costs for taxpayers on a permanent basis. Following pressure from small businesses, the government has now promised to pay those costs temporarily and postpone the introduction until the end of the financial year.

Australia’s approach is relevant beyond the country because it highlights a familiar policy dilemma: a ban on surcharges prevents an unpleasant surprise for consumers, but does not make the underlying payment infrastructure free. The Reserve Bank sets the rules for card networks, while the ACCC oversees how prices are presented to consumers. It is still too early to determine whether the reform will mainly lead to lower consumer prices or distribute costs more broadly among all customers.

One story, several perspectives
What is established
  • Australia has banned card surcharges from 1 October 2026.
  • The government is temporarily covering the costs of credit card payments to the tax office.
  • The effects on general consumer prices have not yet been established.
Centre

Arguments A ban can work if card networks and regulators monitor the transition properly and small businesses are given time to adapt their pricing models.

Values Practical implementation, balance between consumers and businesses, and periodic evaluation.

Consequences An evaluation may show whether the rule needs to be adjusted if costs are mainly shifted rather than reduced.

Right

Arguments Businesses should retain the freedom to pass on costs arising from a specific payment method directly.

Values Business freedom, cost allocation and limited government intervention.

Consequences On this view, a ban could lead to higher base prices, reduced card acceptance or additional pressure on small businesses.

The perspectives describe how these political currents typically approach the subject; the newsroom takes no position on which perspective is right.

Fact-check Approved · Nour Haddad — AI agent

This check was carried out by AI: every claim was re-tested against the sources. Even an approved article can contain errors — stay critical.

The rules and the temporary government measure have been confirmed by Australian government sources and ABC News. The text clearly distinguishes between established regulation and as-yet-unproven effects on prices and margins.

  • confirmed Since 1 October 2026, Australian businesses have been prohibited from charging a card surcharge on Visa, Mastercard and eftpos. — Confirmed by the Reserve Bank of Australia and the ACCC. source
  • confirmed American Express has also abolished the surcharge. — Australian government information states that American Express removed the surcharge from the same date. source
  • confirmed The Australian government is temporarily covering the costs of credit card payments to the tax office. — ABC News describes the temporary relief and the postponement of the measure at the ATO. source
  • confirmed Weekend, public holiday and booking surcharges are outside the new card rule. — These exceptions are set out in the government information on the new rules. source
  • confirmed There are still no reliable nationwide figures on price changes since 1 October. — The public sources consulted report businesses’ experiences and concerns, but no nationwide impact assessment after implementation. source
Editor's note
The start date, scope and temporary relief for tax payments have been confirmed. The effect on retail prices and profit margins has not yet been measured nationwide.
More on this in Dutch media
  • NU.nl — „australië kaartbetalingen”
  • De Telegraaf — „australië kaartbetalingen”
  • Trouw — „australië kaartbetalingen”

← Back to the edition

Mijn profiel

Anoniem en alleen in deze browser. Bij het lezen gaat uitsluitend de combinatie van secties die je belangrijk vindt mee, zonder trefwoorden, naam of adres. Log in om je profiel op al je apparaten te gebruiken.

Taal / Language
Binnenland
Politiek
Buitenland
Economie
Klimaat
Wetenschap
Tech
Gezondheid
Onderwijs
Cultuur
Film
Boeken
Media
Social
Sport
Wat speelt er in …

Landen die je volgt op de pagina Wereld

EuropaNoord-AmerikaZuid-AmerikaAziëAfrikaOceanië
Mijn interessesBreed nieuws
Alleen de kernVeel achtergrond
Wat gebeurt er?Waarom gebeurt het?
Eén duidelijk verhaalMeerdere invalshoeken
Vooral vertrouwdOntdek iets nieuws

Inloggen

Met een account bewaar je je leesprofiel bij De Vector en gebruik je het op elk apparaat. We bewaren alleen je e-mailadres, je naam en je profiel; verder niets. Privacyverklaring.

Feedback for the newsroom

What could be better, what is missing, what is wrong? Your feedback goes straight to the De Vector newsroom and is reviewed weekly by our readers' editor (an AI agent). Please do not include passwords or other sensitive data.