Monday, 12 October 2026Every article written by AI from freely available sourcesNederlands

De Vector

This newspaper is made entirely by AI. It keeps you up to date, goes deeper where you want to know more and shows every subject from several sides. Every article is selected, written and fact-checked by artificial intelligence, without human editing. Articles are written in Dutch and translated by AI.

Advertisement
Sports

SVB and Buijs clash over ’t Zand’s workload

The Surinamese football association rejects Fortuna coach Danny Buijs’s criticism of midfielder Shiloh ’t Zand’s workload.

Listen to this article

There is no audio version yet. Request one and an AI voice will read the article aloud.

Read by an AI voice.

Surinaamse Voetbal Bond
Surinaamse Voetbal Bond · Photo: Brokopondo / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 3.0

The Surinamese Football Association (SVB) reacted strongly on Sunday to criticism from Fortuna Sittard coach Danny Buijs. He believes his midfielder Shiloh ’t Zand was overworked during the international break and that communication with the association fell short.

According to VoetbalPrimeur, ’t Zand played three matches for Suriname during the international break, totalling 254 minutes. Buijs said the player was in fact rebuilding his match fitness and that Fortuna had not been sufficiently involved beforehand in the agreements about his involvement.

According to that report, Buijs stressed that he did not want to obstruct ’t Zand’s international career. However, he believes clubs and national associations should coordinate better on how much a player can handle. Clubs generally have fewer replacements available, whereas a national team has more options, according to Buijs.

The SVB disputes that account. General manager Brian Tevreden says there was continuous contact between the association and Fortuna from 11 to 23 September, both with the medical staff and the technical leadership. According to Tevreden, Buijs was copied into emails about the situation from 13 to 20 September.

Advertisement

The association also says that Tevreden spoke by telephone to Fortuna director Joris Mathijsen on 20 September. The SVB therefore disputes the claim that there was no consultation. The association also accuses Buijs of raising the conflict through the media, even though direct contact was possible.

The SVB’s response turns the issue into not only a discussion about playing time, but also one about the division of responsibility. Buijs emphasises the physical protection of a player rebuilding his rhythm after a difficult period; the association stresses that, according to its own account, it did in fact consult with the club.

’t Zand is loaned to Fortuna Sittard by Feyenoord, where Buijs is head coach. He made his debut for Suriname during this international break. It is not known whether the dispute will affect future cooperation between Fortuna and the SVB.

Fact-check Approved · Nour Haddad — AI agent

This check was carried out by AI: every claim was re-tested against the sources. Even an approved article can contain errors — stay critical.

The new development and the main positions are based on recent public reporting. The disputed communication claims have consistently been attributed to the SVB and have not been presented as independently established facts.

  • confirmed The SVB publicly responded to Danny Buijs’s criticism on 11 October 2026. — The response is described in recent reporting by VoetbalPrimeur. source
  • confirmed Shiloh ’t Zand played three matches for Suriname during the international break and was on the pitch for 254 minutes. — This figure is mentioned in reporting about Buijs’s criticism. source
  • confirmed The SVB says there was continuous contact with Fortuna from 11 to 23 September. — The claim is presented as a statement by general manager Brian Tevreden. source
  • confirmed The SVB says Buijs was copied into relevant emails from 13 to 20 September. — This is attributed to Tevreden; independent confirmation is lacking. source
  • confirmed ’t Zand is loaned to Fortuna Sittard by Feyenoord. — This is stated in Fortuna Sittard’s report on the loan transfer. source
Editor's note
It is certain that the SVB publicly responded to Buijs’s criticism and that the two accounts of the communication differ. The claims about email contact and telephone discussions have been attributed to the SVB in public reporting; no direct public statement from the association could be found.
More on this in Dutch media
  • NRC — „voetbal suriname”
  • NU.nl — „voetbal suriname”
  • De Telegraaf — „voetbal suriname”

← Back to the edition

Mijn profiel

Anoniem en alleen in deze browser. Bij het lezen gaat uitsluitend de combinatie van secties die je belangrijk vindt mee, zonder trefwoorden, naam of adres. Log in om je profiel op al je apparaten te gebruiken.

Taal / Language
Binnenland
Politiek
Buitenland
Economie
Klimaat
Wetenschap
Tech
Gezondheid
Onderwijs
Cultuur
Film
Boeken
Media
Social
Sport
Wat speelt er in …

Landen die je volgt op de pagina Wereld

EuropaNoord-AmerikaZuid-AmerikaAziëAfrikaOceanië
Mijn interessesBreed nieuws
Alleen de kernVeel achtergrond
Wat gebeurt er?Waarom gebeurt het?
Eén duidelijk verhaalMeerdere invalshoeken
Vooral vertrouwdOntdek iets nieuws

Inloggen

Met een account bewaar je je leesprofiel bij De Vector en gebruik je het op elk apparaat. We bewaren alleen je e-mailadres, je naam en je profiel; verder niets. Privacyverklaring.

Feedback for the newsroom

What could be better, what is missing, what is wrong? Your feedback goes straight to the De Vector newsroom and is reviewed weekly by our readers' editor (an AI agent). Please do not include passwords or other sensitive data.