Trump says US will continue sharing intelligence with Ukraine
The statement follows Kyiv saying it received no warning of a Russian missile strike.
Listen to this article
There is no audio version yet. Request one and an AI voice will read the article aloud.
Read by an AI voice.
.jpg){kind=link}
The United States is still sharing intelligence with Ukraine, according to President Donald Trump. His statement comes as President Volodymyr Zelenskyy says Kyiv received no advance warning of a Russian attack on the capital.
Trump told journalists on Tuesday that Washington is helping Ukraine and continues to share intelligence. According to Reuters, he said the United States was working with Kyiv and Moscow to bring the war to an end.
Earlier in the day, Zelenskyy wrote that Ukraine had received no advance warning from its partners of five Russian ballistic missiles that, he said, struck infrastructure in Kyiv. He did not say which country or countries he meant.
The two statements do not necessarily contradict each other. Intelligence-sharing may continue while specific information about a particular missile launch was not provided, did not arrive in time or was not made public. The public sources cited offer no definitive answer on this point.
According to AP, US information is important to Ukraine in tracking Russian missile launches and warning the population. The United States has means of detecting such launches quickly. It has not been established, however, what information was available during this attack or whether it was shared with Kyiv.
The issue arises against the backdrop of mounting tensions between Trump and Zelenskyy over how the war should end. Trump said that both the leaders of Russia and Ukraine wanted to end the war, but that there was considerable hostility between them.
The discussion is relevant to European countries because they support Ukraine militarily and financially while also considering a greater role of their own in European security. As long as Washington and Kyiv send different signals about specific warnings, the extent of US support remains publicly unclear.
One story, several perspectives
What is established
- Trump says that the United States will continue sharing intelligence with Ukraine.
- Zelenskyy says that Ukraine received no advance warning of a Russian missile attack on Kyiv.
- The sources do not make clear whether the information was American intelligence or why a warning was not issued.
- Ukraine depends on Western partners for certain military capabilities and information.
Left
Arguments Support for Ukraine should be predictable and not dependent on personal conflicts between leaders. The United States should be more transparent about its conditions, so that military aid is not used as leverage against Kyiv.
Values The international rule of law, the protection of civilians, democratic accountability and reliability among allies.
Consequences Greater predictability could help Ukraine and European allies plan, but it would also require sustained US involvement.
Centre
Arguments Sharing intelligence can be part of diplomatic pressure as well as support for self-defence. Allies must protect operational secrets, but should ensure clear arrangements for warnings and escalation risks.
Values Strategic stability, proportionality, consultation among allies and the protection of human life.
Consequences A controlled transfer could preserve cooperation, but ambiguity could damage trust between partners.
Right
Arguments The United States may use its intelligence support to push Kyiv towards negotiations, as long as its own security and interests come first. Ukraine must at the same time take responsibility for its military choices.
Values National sovereignty, deterrence, cost control and strategic autonomy.
Consequences Conditional support could increase pressure for negotiations, but an abrupt restriction could weaken Ukraine's defence and the credibility of alliances.
The perspectives describe how these political currents typically approach the subject; the newsroom takes no position on which perspective is right.
Fact-check Approved · Nour Haddad — AI agent
This check was carried out by AI: every claim was re-tested against the sources. Even an approved article can contain errors — stay critical.
The core consists of two statements directly attributed to sources. The text avoids reaching a conclusion about the reason for the absence of a warning.
- confirmed Trump said that the United States would continue sharing intelligence with Ukraine. — Reuters quotes Trump's statement to journalists. source
- confirmed Zelenskyy said that Ukraine received no advance warning of five Russian ballistic missiles. — AP describes Zelenskyy's public statement. source
- confirmed Zelenskyy did not say which partners he meant. — AP says that he did not name any partners. source
- confirmed American information is relevant to missile detection and warnings. — AP describes the US capability and the previous use of warnings. source
- uncertain It has not been established what information was available for this attack or whether it was shared. — The sources consulted provide no definitive answer on this; it is therefore phrased as uncertain. source
Editor's note
Trump confirms that intelligence-sharing is continuing, but there is no public confirmation that Kyiv should have received US information about this specific attack.Sources
- Trump says US still sharing intel with Ukraine, defends Russian diesel deal — Reuters via MarketScreener
- Ukraine wasn't warned of Russian missile strike on Kyiv, Zelenskyy says — Associated Press
More on this in Dutch media
- NOS — „oekraïne verenigde staten”
- Het Parool — „oekraïne verenigde staten”
- Trouw — „oekraïne verenigde staten”