German minister must remove Instagram video about Die Linke
The constitutional court is temporarily protecting the party against possible harm through a ministry’s official account.
Listen to this article
There is no audio version yet. Request one and an AI voice will read the article aloud.
Read by an AI voice.
Germany’s Minister for Economic Affairs, Katherina Reiche, must temporarily remove an Instagram video containing accusations against Die Linke from her ministry’s account. This follows a decision by the Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht) that became public on Thursday 15 October. The court has yet to assess whether the publication actually breaches the constitution.
The decision is dated 14 October and follows an urgent application by Die Linke. The party has also brought substantive proceedings against the minister. The interim measure applies until those proceedings are decided, for a maximum of six months. This gives Die Linke protection during the ongoing dispute, without the judges having definitively established that Reiche exceeded her powers.
The case concerns a video published on the ministry’s official Instagram profile on 24 September. In it, the CDU minister speaks about a party in Berlin that she says promotes antisemitism and frightens Jewish residents. She also criticises plans for expropriation. Although Reiche does not name the party directly, according to the AFP news agency, the contested passage targets Die Linke. The accusations are her political statements; this decision does not confirm them.
The background is Die Linke’s possible participation in a new state government in Berlin. According to Deutschlandfunk, the judges explicitly take the ongoing talks on forming a government into account. Die Linke argues that the minister used her authority and public resources against a political competitor. The party invokes its right to equal opportunities in political competition.
In the urgent proceedings, the court compared the possible consequences of intervening and waiting. If the video remains available and Die Linke ultimately wins the case, the party may meanwhile have suffered political harm that can no longer be remedied. If the video is temporarily removed and Reiche later wins the case, she can circulate her remarks again. That assessment favoured temporary removal.
The measure leaves room for political expression. Reiche may continue to express her views as a party politician or private individual within the bounds of freedom of expression. In her ministerial role, she may also highlight potential dangers to the economy and the investment climate. According to legal reporting by beck-aktuell, she must do so within constitutional limits, without the contested characterisations of Die Linke used in this video.
Reiche had previously defended her conduct. According to ARD, she stated through her lawyer in early October that the remarks were constitutionally permissible. Following the decision, the ministry told the broadcaster that it would study the ruling and comply with it. The reporting consulted does not yet confirm that the video has actually been removed.
The case gives concrete form to a broader democratic question: how much scope does a minister have to criticise political opponents through a government channel? A minister holds both a political position and a public office. The substantive proceedings must establish whether Reiche crossed the boundary between those roles with this publication. The current decision provides only a provisional answer.
Also show where in Europe and in the world
One story, several perspectives
What is established
- The post appeared on the ministry’s official Instagram account.
- The court ordered temporary removal following an urgent application by Die Linke.
- The final assessment of constitutionality remains pending.
Left
Arguments Public resources must not strengthen the position of governing parties at the expense of opposition parties. Serious accusations made through a ministry require particular restraint and substantiation.
Values Political equality, protection of the opposition and limits on state power.
Consequences Without clear boundaries, official communications can damage political opponents before a court can provide a remedy.
Centre
Arguments Ministers must be able to defend policy, while institutional communications remain subject to requirements of care. An interim measure can limit potential harm while the substantive proceedings provide scope for a full assessment.
Values The rule of law, proportionality and trust in public institutions.
Consequences A clear distinction between party communications and ministerial information provides predictable rules for both opposition parties and ministers.
Right
Arguments A minister must be able to raise concerns publicly about antisemitism, property rights and the investment climate. Neutrality rules must leave room for robust, substantiated criticism, including when it is politically sensitive.
Values Freedom of expression, protection of property and political responsibility.
Consequences Overly broad restrictions can make ministers reluctant to discuss relevant risks; clear requirements concerning substantiation and the channel used can prevent this.
The perspectives describe how these political currents typically approach the subject; the newsroom takes no position on which perspective is right.
Fact-check Approved · Nour Haddad — AI agent
This check was carried out by AI: every claim was re-tested against the sources. Even an approved article can contain errors — stay critical.
Several independent sources confirm the interim obligation to remove the video and distinguish it from the substantive proceedings, which have yet to be heard. The date of the decision has been checked; the accusations against Die Linke are presented solely as statements by Reiche.
- confirmed The decision is dated 14 October 2026 and was announced on 15 October. — The lawyers’ statement published on 15 October explicitly refers to the decision of 14 October; beck-aktuell confirms that decision date. source
- confirmed Reiche must temporarily remove the video; the measure applies until the decision in the substantive proceedings, for a maximum of six months. — The legal reporting states the measure and both limits. source
- confirmed The video appeared on the ministry’s official account on 24 September and contained indirect accusations against Die Linke. — AFP gives the publication date and account, and notes the absence of any direct mention of the party’s name. source
- confirmed Die Linke lodged an urgent application and brought substantive proceedings; talks on forming the Berlin government are taken into account. — Deutschlandfunk describes both proceedings and the significance of the government formation talks. source
- confirmed The court based its interim decision on an assessment of potential harm. — AFP describes the irreparable harm that continued publication could cause and the possibility of republication later. source
- confirmed Reiche remains free to express political views; no final decision has yet been made on constitutionality. — Beck-aktuell distinguishes between party political statements, factual ministerial communications and the pending substantive proceedings. source
- confirmed Reiche previously defended the publication; her ministry has undertaken to implement the consequences of the decision. — ARD reports both the earlier defence through her lawyer and the ministry’s response to the ruling. source
Editor's note
The decision is dated 14 October and was publicly reported on 15 October, within the timeframe for current news. The primary statement comes from Die Linke’s lawyers and is therefore a source representing one party to the case; independent reporting confirms the core details. The original text of the court’s decision was not consulted directly. The actual removal of the video and the outcome of the substantive proceedings have not been established. The perspectives describe possible political considerations, not attributed party reactions.Sources
- Bundesverfassungsgericht: Wirtschaftsministerin Reiche muss Instagram-Video gegen Die Linke entfernen — Prigge Recht
- Reiche muss Instagram-Video mit Antisemitismusvorwürfen gegen Linkspartei vorerst entfernen — Deutschlandfunk
- Video mit Antisemitismusvorwurf: Reiche muss Instagram-Post über Linke löschen — Tagesschau / ARD
- Erfolgreicher Eilantrag der Linken: Reiche muss Instagram-Video entfernen — beck-aktuell
- Ministerin Reiche muss Video mit Vorwürfen gegen Linke vorläufig löschen — AFP via Berliner Börsenzeitung
More on this in Dutch media
- de Volkskrant — „duitsland katherina reiche”
- RTL Nieuws — „duitsland katherina reiche”
- NOS — „duitsland katherina reiche”