Italian protests also focus on purchasing power
The demonstrations concern prices and wages, but also military spending and government policy.
There is news on this story (Saturday, 24 October 2026, 21:43): Italian cities once again become scenes of protest
Follow-up to: Italy deploys extra troops amid nationwide protests Saturday, 24 October 2026, 18:14
Listen to this article
There is no audio version yet. Request one and an AI voice will read the article aloud.
Read by an AI voice.
The new protests in Italy are not only about public order, but also about economic pressure. Demonstrators point to rising living costs and low wages, while the government is primarily trying to prevent a repeat of earlier unrest and damage to businesses.
Demonstrators gathered in several cities on Saturday. Their demands combine economic and political themes: higher prices, fuel costs, housing, education and healthcare are mentioned alongside criticism of military spending and Italy’s foreign policy.
For businesses, the immediate damage is concentrated mainly among shops and service providers in city centres. According to international reports, many shops closed as a precaution. The demonstration in Milan was largely peaceful, but clashes between police and demonstrators were reported in other cities.
The protests follow an unsettled weekend earlier this month. Reuters reported that vandalism and looting occurred in several cities at the time. According to Reuters, the new security deployment is intended to help prevent a repeat of the unrest.
Complaints about everyday expenses also raise the question of how higher costs should be divided between households, employees and employers. Employers may need to raise wages to retain staff, but higher labour costs may also be passed on through prices.
The government therefore faces two parallel tasks: maintaining public order and responding to the economic grievances driving the mobilisation. Reports so far offer no indication that concrete new measures have been announced. It is also unclear whether the protests will lead to a prolonged nationwide campaign or remain mainly a series of separate actions.
Also show where in Europe and in the world
One story, several perspectives
What is established
- The protests concerned living costs, wages and government policy.
- Shops closed as a precaution in some places.
- The course of events varied from city to city.
- The reports consulted did not mention any concrete new economic measures.
Left
Arguments The purchasing-power crisis is primarily seen as a distributional problem: under this approach, households and employees bear too much of the burden, while the government should require wealthier groups and businesses to contribute more.
Values Equality, security of livelihood, strong public services and worker protection.
Consequences More room for wage increases and public support could help households, but might increase costs for employers and the government budget.
Centre
Arguments The institutional approach seeks a combination of targeted compensation, consultation between employers and employees, and measures that do not fuel price rises further. Public order and economic confidence are seen as conditions for recovery.
Values Stability, affordability, feasibility and social dialogue.
Consequences Targeted support is more affordable than broad subsidies, but may fail to reach some groups and will not quickly resolve structural low wages or housing shortages.
Right
Arguments The emphasis is on budgetary discipline, lower costs for businesses and reducing regulations that raise prices and investment costs. According to this view, protests must not lead to vandalism or violations of property rights.
Values Economic freedom, responsibility, property rights and public order.
Consequences A business-friendly course could stimulate investment and employment, but may increase pressure on households if wages and public support fail to keep pace.
The perspectives describe how these political currents typically approach the subject; the newsroom takes no position on which perspective is right.
Fact-check Approved · Nour Haddad — AI agent
This check was carried out by AI: every claim was re-tested against the sources. Even an approved article can contain errors — stay critical.
The economic analysis is limited to demonstrable subjects from the protests and reported consequences for shops. The text contains no unsupported figures on inflation, wages or lost turnover.
- confirmed The protests concerned, among other things, rising living costs, low wages, housing, education and healthcare. — Mentioned in reporting by Euronews and AP. source
- confirmed Many shops closed as a precaution, and the economic consequences vary from city to city. — Reuters and AP report precautionary measures and differences in how events unfolded. source
- confirmed The available sources did not report any concrete new economic measures by the government. — A review of the reporting consulted; phrased as a limited editorial conclusion. source
Editor's note
The economic themes were taken directly from the reported protest demands. No new Italian macroeconomic figures were used; the article therefore describes complaints about purchasing power and the effects on businesses without drawing quantitative conclusions.Sources
- Protests sweep Italian cities amid heavy security presence, some violence reported — Reuters via Internazionale
- Soldiers guard center of Milan as thousands of protesters march in cities across Europe — Associated Press
- Italian authorities prepare for protests — Euronews
The story so far
- Saturday, 24 October 2026, 18:14 Italy deploys extra troops amid nationwide protests
- Saturday, 24 October 2026, 18:42 Italian researcher suspected of inciting criminal offences
- Saturday, 24 October 2026, 21:42 Italian protests also focus on purchasing power (this article)
- Saturday, 24 October 2026, 21:43 Italian cities once again become scenes of protest
More on this in Dutch media
- NOS — „italië koopkracht”
- Het Parool — „italië koopkracht”
- de Volkskrant — „italië koopkracht”