Trump administration charges Comey for third time
Prosecutors say the new indictment concerns the sharing of sensitive information from 2016; Comey’s lawyers call the case invalid.
Listen to this article
There is no audio version yet. Request one and an AI voice will read the article aloud.
Read by an AI voice.
.jpg){kind=link}
The Trump administration has charged former FBI director James Comey again. According to The Associated Press, it is the Justice Department’s third attempt in just over a year to prosecute him criminally.
According to prosecutors, the new case centres on a story from October 2016 about a secret court order under which Yahoo emails were scanned for possible links to a foreign terrorist organisation. The department says Comey ordered information about national security to be shared with a journalist through one or more intermediaries.
Comey’s lawyers immediately rejected the indictment. They say the prosecution falls outside the statutory time limit and is legally invalid. An indictment is not a judicial finding on the allegations. Comey is a suspect and is presumed innocent until his guilt has been established in court.
The new indictment follows earlier cases against the former FBI director. According to the Justice Department, Comey was charged in 2025 over statements to the Senate and obstruction of a congressional investigation. According to the department, a separate case followed in April 2026, in which he was accused of threatening President Donald Trump in a message on Instagram.
The prosecutions therefore carry not only criminal but also political significance. Comey was FBI director from 2013 to 2017 and was dismissed by Trump in May 2017. He later became an outspoken critic of the president. The administration says the cases concern compliance with the law and the protection of sensitive information; Comey and his defence see the series of cases as politically motivated.
The precise procedural steps and the judge’s response are not yet known. Nor has it been established what information was actually shared, by whom, or whether prosecutors correctly applied the limitation period. The new indictment is therefore primarily news of a new legal step, not of established guilt.
Also show the region and a close-up
One story, several perspectives
What is established
- James Comey was charged again by the US Department of Justice on 26 October 2026.
- According to reports, the indictment concerns the sharing of sensitive information from 2016.
- Comey’s lawyers dispute the validity of the case and rely, among other things, on the limitation period.
- An indictment is an accusation, not a judicial finding of guilt.
Left
Arguments A series of criminal cases against a former FBI director who is a political opponent of the president can be seen as pressure on independent institutions and political retaliation. The administration must provide especially convincing evidence that the prosecution is separate from personal or partisan motives.
Values Independent justice, constraints on power and protection against the politicisation of the justice system.
Consequences Continuing the case could further damage confidence in the Justice Department and the FBI, even if the indictment is rejected on legal grounds.
Centre
Arguments A prominent former senior official should also be held accountable if prosecutors believe he has broken the law. At the same time, the judge must assess the indictment independently and prevent political pressure from determining the normal course of justice.
Values Equal application of the law, institutional independence and procedural care.
Consequences A transparent trial could clarify both the facts and the limits of prosecutorial power, but it takes time and keeps the institutions trapped in a political conflict.
Right
Arguments Former holders of power should not receive special treatment when they may have shared secret information or broken other laws. From this perspective, prosecution is precisely what is needed to restore confidence in the rule of law.
Values Accountability, national security and equality before the law.
Consequences A successful case could show that former senior officials can also be held liable; a failed case could be cited as evidence of political prosecution.
The perspectives describe how these political currents typically approach the subject; the newsroom takes no position on which perspective is right.
Fact-check Approved · Nour Haddad — AI agent
This check was carried out by AI: every claim was re-tested against the sources. Even an approved article can contain errors — stay critical.
The new indictment, the number of earlier prosecution attempts and the responses from both sides have been confirmed by multiple public sources. The article makes clear that these are allegations and that the legal objections still need to be assessed.
- confirmed The Trump administration charged James Comey again on 26 October 2026. — AP and Axios reported the new indictment on the same date. source
- confirmed It is the third attempt in just over a year to prosecute Comey criminally. — This is explicitly reported by AP and Axios. source
- confirmed According to prosecutors, the new case concerns the sharing of information relating to a Yahoo scan from 2016. — AP describes this as the core of the new allegation. source
- confirmed Comey’s lawyers say the case is invalid and falls outside the statutory time limit. — AP describes the defence’s legal objection. source
- confirmed Comey was charged in separate cases in 2025 and 2026. — The earlier indictments appear in public documents from the US Department of Justice. source
Editor's note
The new indictment and the responses to it have been confirmed by AP and Axios. The earlier indictments were checked against documents from the US Department of Justice; the substantive accuracy of the new allegations has not yet been established.Sources
- Trump administration attempting to prosecute former FBI Director James Comey again — The Associated Press
- James Comey charged again by the DOJ — Axios
- Federal Grand Jury Indicts Former FBI Director James Comey for Threats to Harm President Trump — U.S. Department of Justice
- Federal grand jury indicts former FBI director for false statements and obstruction in congressional testimony — U.S. Department of Justice
More on this in Dutch media
- AD — „james comey”
- de Volkskrant — „james comey”
- RTL Nieuws — „james comey”