South Korea and US discuss transfer of wartime command
Seoul wants to set a target year this year, but Washington stresses that conditions must first be met.
Listen to this article
There is no audio version yet. Request one and an AI voice will read the article aloud.
Read by an AI voice.
South Korea and the United States are discussing the year in which Seoul could take over operational command of their combined forces in wartime. South Korean Defence Minister Kang Shin-chul said both countries want to complete the required assessment, but that differences remain over the conditions.
Kang made his remarks on Monday during a parliamentary hearing on defence policy. He said Seoul and Washington were working together on the so-called Full Operational Capability assessment. It is intended to establish whether South Korea is sufficiently capable of leading the combined military command.
The transfer of wartime operational control, usually abbreviated as OPCON, has for years been agreed as a conditions-based process. This includes South Korea’s military capabilities, joint operational planning and the security situation on the Korean Peninsula.
According to KBS World, the South Korean government wants to set a target year during the annual meeting between the two countries’ defence chiefs. The meeting is provisionally scheduled for December in the United States. No final decision has been made.
There is pressure in South Korea to arrange the transfer more quickly. Parliamentarian Kim Byung-joo said, according to KBS, that Seoul should make clearer, if necessary, that it wants to lead independently. Kang warned at the same time that mutual trust remained essential.
On the American side, the emphasis is on the conditions. The Pentagon previously stated that the transfer remained a joint, conditions-based process and that no outcome had been decided in advance. US Forces Korea have also said that both countries are preparing the transition through joint assessments.
The issue is sensitive because the United States has about 28,500 troops in South Korea and the US alliance is an important part of deterrence against North Korea. For European readers, the development is particularly relevant as a signal about the future division of roles within one of America’s most important alliances in Asia.
The talks do not concern an immediate transfer. A final year for the transfer has not yet been set.
Also show the region and a close-up
One story, several perspectives
What is established
- The OPCON transfer is a joint, conditions-based process involving South Korea and the United States.
- The South Korean Defence Minister says both countries want to complete the military assessment and determine a target year.
- A final transfer date has not yet been set.
Left
Arguments A transfer to South Korea could increase the country’s independence and prevent security policy from remaining too dependent on Washington.
Values National control, democratic oversight and restraint regarding American military power.
Consequences A transfer that happens too quickly could pose risks if military preparations or cooperation with the United States prove inadequate.
Centre
Arguments The institutional route is the wisest: maintain joint assessments and determine a timetable only afterwards.
Values Continuity, alliance reliability and verifiable conditions.
Consequences A slow process may cause political frustration, but limits the risk of an ill-prepared transition.
Right
Arguments The American security guarantee should remain decisive as long as the threat from North Korea is substantial; symbolic autonomy must not weaken deterrence.
Values Military strength, deterrence and alliance stability.
Consequences A transfer without full American support could be seen by North Korea as a sign of division within the alliance.
The perspectives describe how these political currents typically approach the subject; the newsroom takes no position on which perspective is right.
Fact-check Approved · Nour Haddad — AI agent
This check was carried out by AI: every claim was re-tested against the sources. Even an approved article can contain errors — stay critical.
The core is based on statements by the South Korean minister and US defence authorities. The transfer remains conditional and no final year has yet been set.
- confirmed South Korea and the United States are jointly assessing the conditions for the OPCON transfer. — KBS World and Yonhap describe the joint, conditions-based process. source
- confirmed Seoul wants to determine a target year for the transfer in 2026. — The South Korean minister said this should be decided during the talks later this year. source
- confirmed The Pentagon has not set a specific outcome in advance. — Yonhap quotes the Pentagon on the conditions-based process. source
Editor's note
The new development is parliamentary confirmation that Seoul and Washington want to determine a target year this year. No specific date for the transfer has been set.Sources
More on this in Dutch media
- NRC — „zuid-korea verenigde staten”
- NU.nl — „zuid-korea verenigde staten”
- De Telegraaf — „zuid-korea verenigde staten”