Afghanistan’s opium production rises despite Taliban ban
According to the UN, the cultivated area grew by 330 per cent, but remains below pre-ban levels.
Listen to this article
There is no audio version yet. Request one and an AI voice will read the article aloud.
Read by an AI voice.
The cultivation of poppies and production of opium in Afghanistan have risen sharply this year. The UN Office on Drugs and Crime says the increase is linked to poverty and a lack of viable alternatives for farmers.
According to new figures from the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), the area used to grow poppies increased from approximately 10,000 hectares in 2025 to more than 43,000 hectares in 2026. Estimated opium production rose by approximately 400 per cent over the same period.
It is the first clear increase since the Taliban imposed a ban on opium cultivation in 2022. According to the UN, production and cultivation remain below pre-ban levels, but the new figures point to a clear reversal of the earlier decline.
The UN attributes the increase partly to the economic situation in rural areas. Farmers are reportedly hiding small poppy fields among cereal fields or within walled compounds to evade enforcement.
The Taliban authorities say the fight against drugs is an important achievement. At the same time, according to AP, they acknowledge that international support is needed to keep the problem under control. The UN is calling for investment in agriculture, infrastructure and access to markets.
Before the ban, Afghanistan was the world’s largest opium producer and a major source of heroin for Europe and Asia. The return of cultivation therefore affects not only Afghan farmers, but could in time also be relevant to international drug markets.
The figures do not show how much of the opium produced actually leaves Afghanistan or what impact the increase has on the availability of heroin in Europe. The UN also warns that it is too early to determine whether the increase is temporary or marks the beginning of a broader return of the opium sector.
The development highlights the tension between enforcement and livelihoods. A ban can quickly reduce production, but without profitable alternatives, farmers remain strongly incentivised to circumvent it. That is a policy conclusion drawn from the figures, not a claim that all farmers engage in illegal activity entirely by free choice.
Also show the region and a close-up
One story, several perspectives
What is established
- UNODC reports a sharp increase in poppy cultivation and opium production in 2026.
- The Taliban announced a ban on cultivation in 2022.
- The UN says poverty and the absence of alternative sources of income make compliance more difficult.
- Cultivation remains below pre-ban levels.
Left
Arguments A left-wing approach emphasises that farmers without income alternatives should not be treated solely as offenders; international aid and public investment are needed.
Values Poverty reduction, social justice and public health.
Consequences Greater support for legal agriculture could reduce dependence on drugs, but would require long-term international engagement.
Centre
Arguments An institutional approach combines enforcement with controlled development aid and seeks first to measure more accurately which parts of the chain are actually recovering.
Values Effectiveness, international cooperation and evidence-based policy.
Consequences A combination of prohibition, monitoring and alternative agriculture could work, but the results are likely to be slow and uneven.
Right
Arguments A right-wing approach emphasises strict enforcement, border controls and preventing illegal production from once again fuelling international drug markets.
Values Public order, national security and responsibility for compliance.
Consequences A tough response could limit production, but without economic alternatives it could further impoverish farmers and drive cultivation underground.
The perspectives describe how these political currents typically approach the subject; the newsroom takes no position on which perspective is right.
Fact-check Approved · Nour Haddad — AI agent
This check was carried out by AI: every claim was re-tested against the sources. Even an approved article can contain errors — stay critical.
The key figures and dating have been confirmed by AP and additional reporting based on UNODC. The consequences for European drug markets have deliberately been presented as uncertain rather than as an established result.
- confirmed Poppy cultivation rose from approximately 10,000 to more than 43,000 hectares. — AP cites the figures from the UNODC report. source
- confirmed Opium production rose by approximately 400 per cent. — AP reports the increase based on UNODC figures. source
- confirmed The increase is the first clear rise since the 2022 Taliban ban. — AP describes this as the first significant increase since the ban. source
- confirmed The UN links the increase to poverty and a lack of alternatives. — AP quotes UNODC’s statement on this. source
- confirmed It is not yet clear whether the increase is temporary or structural. — AP reports this warning from the UN. source
Editor's note
The increase and the figures are based on AP and a summary of UNODC findings. The UN warns that it has not yet been established whether this is a temporary resurgence or a structural return.Sources
- UN reports a sharp rise in Afghanistan poppy cultivation despite a Taliban ban — Associated Press
- UNODC: Afghanistan opium cultivation surges 325% in 2026 — Amu TV
- World Drug Report 2026 — United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime
More on this in Dutch media
- AD — „afghanistan opium”
- de Volkskrant — „afghanistan opium”
- RTL Nieuws — „afghanistan opium”