SUSE plans to cut around one in ten jobs worldwide
The software maker cites automation and AI as part of a broader review of its strategy.
Listen to this article
There is no audio version yet. Request one and an AI voice will read the article aloud.
Read by an AI voice.
SUSE plans to cut around 10 per cent of its worldwide workforce. According to The Register, chief executive Dirk-Peter van Leeuwen wrote that automation and AI are changing work processes, but also linked the reorganisation to a broader strategic review.
SUSE makes software for Linux and other open-source infrastructure. According to reports, the company has around 1,900 employees. An internal announcement to staff refers to a reduction of around 10 per cent in the worldwide workforce, but gives no breakdown by country, role or location.
According to The Register, SUSE is examining which skills, teams and structures are needed for its future strategy. The chief executive describes automation and AI as developments that are already changing day-to-day work. AI is therefore cited as a factor, but not as the sole reason for the reorganisation.
The job cuts come at a time when software companies are investing heavily in generative AI while also trying to keep their costs under control. For companies, automation can make product development and support more efficient. For workers, it can mean that roles disappear, change or acquire higher technical requirements.
SUSE is owned by the Swedish investment company EQT. The business has not yet provided public details about how the job cuts will be distributed or about possible redundancy arrangements. The reports do not indicate how many jobs in the Netherlands will be affected.
The announcement does not prove that AI alone is the cause of all the redundancies. It does show, however, how companies are using the technology as part of strategic decisions about staffing, product development and costs. The precise role automation is playing in the disappearance of roles at SUSE remains unclear.
One story, several perspectives
What is established
- SUSE announced a worldwide job reduction of around 10 per cent.
- The company cites automation and AI as developments that are changing work.
- There are no public details yet about how the job cuts will be distributed.
Left
Arguments Technological productivity gains should not automatically end up with shareholders. Workers should receive protection, training and a say when AI changes their roles.
Values Job security, solidarity and a fair distribution of the benefits of technology.
Consequences Without agreements, workers may bear the costs of digitalisation while companies retain the benefits.
Centre
Arguments Companies must be able to adapt to new technology, but should make clear which jobs are disappearing, which new roles are emerging and what support is available.
Values Adaptability, transparency and social dialogue.
Consequences A careful process can ease the transition, but may make reorganisations slower or more expensive.
Right
Arguments A technology company must be able to adjust its workforce to changing market conditions. Excessive rules around reorganisations can discourage investment and innovation.
Values Entrepreneurship, competitiveness and flexibility.
Consequences Rapid adaptation can strengthen the company, but increases uncertainty for workers in the short term.
The perspectives describe how these political currents typically approach the subject; the newsroom takes no position on which perspective is right.
Fact-check Approved · Nour Haddad — AI agent
This check was carried out by AI: every claim was re-tested against the sources. Even an approved article can contain errors — stay critical.
The main facts have been confirmed by two public technology sources. The text avoids the stronger but unproven claim that AI is the sole cause of the redundancies.
- confirmed SUSE plans to cut around 10 per cent of its worldwide workforce. — Mentioned in reports about an internal announcement from the CEO. source
- confirmed SUSE has around 1,900 employees. — Figure cited by The Register. source
- confirmed Automation and AI are mentioned alongside broader strategic reasons. — The sources used describe AI and automation as well as strategy, skills and team structures. source