itch.io reports removal of terabytes of AI content and expands filter
The indie platform wants to give users more control over games made with generative AI.
Listen to this article
There is no audio version yet. Request one and an AI voice will read the article aloud.
Read by an AI voice.
The digital indie platform itch.io says it has removed several terabytes of content made with generative AI. The platform is also expanding its filters, allowing users to more easily keep games containing AI material out of search results.
itch.io announced the removal on Tuesday via its public Bluesky account. The platform itself used the term ‘AI slop’, an informal description of large amounts of quickly produced or low-quality AI content. The quantity given in terabytes does not indicate how many files or games were removed.
According to trade publication PC Gamer, the number of new game pages on itch.io doubled in two months. The number of downloads and purchases did not double, according to the same source. itch.io has given no reason for that growth, but the timing coincides with a broader increase in the use of generative AI in game development.
The new filter is intended to allow users to keep games involving various forms of generative AI out of search results. The system works on the basis of information provided by creators about their games. As a result, a filter does not independently establish whether content was made with AI.
The measure raises the question of how open publishing and quality control can coexist. itch.io gives independent creators space to publish games and digital projects, but larger quantities of automatically generated uploads can affect search results and visibility for creators. Labelling can help users make choices, but a broad filter can also exclude very different uses of AI at the same time.
The move is not a ban on generative AI on the platform. According to the available information, itch.io is removing some content and making it possible to filter certain categories. Nor has it been independently established how much of the removed content was actually generated by AI. The development therefore primarily forms part of a debate about transparency, moderation and the distribution of attention on digital marketplaces.
One story, several perspectives
What is established
- itch.io says it removed several terabytes of AI-related content.
- The platform is expanding filters that allow users to exclude generative-AI content.
- The platform has not announced a ban on all generative AI.
Left
Arguments A platform should protect users and creators from a flood of automatically produced content that displaces attention and income. Transparency about AI use and active moderation can support cultural diversity and the quality of work.
Values Equal access to visibility, protection of creators and public oversight of digital infrastructure.
Consequences Without intervention, human creators may become harder to find; stricter rules may simultaneously disadvantage legitimate experimental projects.
Centre
Arguments Labelling and user filters offer a workable compromise between open publishing and freedom of choice. Moderation should remain accountable and proportionate, because otherwise platforms may remove content arbitrarily.
Values Transparency, practicality and room for innovation within clear rules.
Consequences A good labelling system can increase trust, but remains dependent on accurate information from creators and sufficient enforcement.
Right
Arguments A platform should be able to decide for itself what content it accepts, and users should be able to choose what they see. A broad removal campaign could, however, result in private censorship or the exclusion of inexpensive tools for small developers.
Values Ownership, entrepreneurship, freedom of choice and restraint in centralised control.
Consequences Greater platform freedom may increase innovation and choice, but also leaves more responsibility with users and may resolve quality problems less quickly.
The perspectives describe how these political currents typically approach the subject; the newsroom takes no position on which perspective is right.
Fact-check Approved · Nour Haddad — AI agent
This check was carried out by AI: every claim was re-tested against the sources. Even an approved article can contain errors — stay critical.
itch.io’s announcement was checked directly, while the additional figures and context come from PC Gamer. Uncertainties about the quality and exact scale of the removed content are qualified in the text.
- confirmed itch.io reported on 3 November that it had removed several terabytes of AI content. — This is stated in itch.io’s public Bluesky post. source
- confirmed The platform is expanding filters that allow users to exclude AI games. — PC Gamer describes the expansion of the generative-AI filters. source
- confirmed The number of new game pages doubled in two months, while downloads and purchases did not double. — PC Gamer attributes these figures and qualification to itch.io. source
- confirmed The filter does not independently prove whether a game contains AI. — This is a journalistic explanation of how a filter based on creator information works, not a claim about a specific platform figure. source
Editor's note
The removal and expansion of the filters were reported by itch.io itself. The scale of the removed content is a broad description by the platform; there is no independent inventory, and the term ‘AI slop’ has no technical definition.Sources
More on this in Dutch media
- RTL Nieuws — „itch.io generatieve ai”
- FD — „itch.io generatieve ai”
- Trouw — „itch.io generatieve ai”