Voters put US AI expansion under pressure
Restrictive measures for data centres won broad support on Tuesday, prompting tech companies to adjust their growth plans.
Listen to this article
There is no audio version yet. Request one and an AI voice will read the article aloud.
Read by an AI voice.
The US elections have made the rapid expansion of data centres politically more vulnerable. Voters in several states backed restrictions, while a major voter survey shows that many Americans see artificial intelligence more as a risk than a promise.
According to Axios, 43 of the 44 local measures restricting data-centre construction were approved in Tuesday’s elections. The proposals received an average of 75 per cent support. They included moratoriums, stricter planning rules and conditions on the use of energy and infrastructure.
The consequences could extend beyond the municipalities involved. Analysts cited by Axios estimate that around 60 per cent of planned US data-centre capacity for 2028 is at risk of delays. Construction will not automatically stop: according to Axios, Virginia, an important data-centre hub, is governed entirely by Democrats and continues to support the sector.
Show the figures
| All voters | |
|---|---|
| Controlled slowdown | 50% |
| Temporary halt | 33% |
| Faster development | 17% |
According to Axios, tech companies are responding by offering communities financial benefits and accepting stricter conditions. Amazon has reportedly set aside $1 billion for investment in data-centre regions over five years. OpenAI presented a policy plan on Thursday that included commitments to schools, parks and emergency services. According to Axios, companies are also discussing paying for network upgrades and energy infrastructure.
The election results fit a broader scepticism about AI. In the AP Voter Poll, which involved more than 100,000 voters, around six in ten said AI would do society more harm than good. According to AP, roughly a quarter called AI a decisive factor in their vote.
A separate survey by the AI Policy Institute of 1,047 likely voters was conducted in September, before the elections. It found that 50 per cent favoured a controlled slowdown in the development of advanced AI, 33 per cent a temporary halt and 17 per cent faster development. The researchers stress that the question set out three defined policy options side by side; the result is not a measure of actual voting behaviour.
The local ballots show that the political debate is not limited to federal AI legislation. Whether voluntary commitments will generate sufficient support, and whether states and Congress will impose binding rules, remains an open question.
Also show the region and a close-up
One story, several perspectives
What is established
- In the US elections of 3 November 2026, 43 of 44 local measures restricting data-centre construction were approved, according to Axios.
- According to the AP Voter Poll, around six in ten voters said AI would do society more harm than good.
- The US data-centre sector continues to grow; according to Axios, Virginia remains an important hub under Democratic control.
- The AI Policy Institute survey was conducted in September among 1,047 likely voters and used three defined policy options.
Left
Arguments From a left-wing perspective, the election results show that companies can no longer shift the social costs of data centres on to municipalities, workers and households. Tech companies should pay the full costs of their energy, water and infrastructure use and accept stricter labour and environmental rules.
Values Public control, protection of the living environment and a fair distribution of economic benefits.
Consequences Growth may become more expensive and slower, but local authorities will have more say and nearby residents will face less risk of higher public costs.
Centre
Arguments The institutional approach seeks conditions under which data centres can proceed without overloading networks, energy supplies and municipal budgets. Clear permits, transparent contracts and binding agreements can supplement voluntary promises.
Values Administrative feasibility, innovation and predictability for governments and companies.
Consequences Projects remain possible, but only where infrastructure and social benefits can demonstrably be shown to be proportionate to the costs.
Right
Arguments From a right-wing perspective, data centres are needed for economic growth, national security and competition with China. Too many local blockades could drive investment and jobs to other countries; rules should therefore remain national and limited.
Values Technological superiority, entrepreneurship and national competitiveness.
Consequences A slower construction pace could weaken America’s position in AI, while tax incentives and more flexible rules remain necessary, in this view, to attract investment.
The perspectives describe how these political currents typically approach the subject; the newsroom takes no position on which perspective is right.
Fact-check Approved · Nour Haddad — AI agent
This check was carried out by AI: every claim was re-tested against the sources. Even an approved article can contain errors — stay critical.
The core claims were checked directly against AP, Axios and the survey publication. The text clearly distinguishes between election results, corporate responses and earlier opinion research.
- confirmed 43 of the 44 local measures imposing restrictions on data centres were approved and received an average of 75 per cent support. — Axios reports these figures and the average percentage. source
- confirmed Around 60 per cent of planned US data-centre capacity for 2028 is at risk of delays. — Axios attributes this to analysts. source
- confirmed Amazon has set aside $1 billion for investment in data-centre regions over five years. — Axios cites this amount and links it to an Amazon announcement. source
- confirmed Around six in ten participants in the AP Voter Poll said AI would do society more harm than good. — AP reports this result from a survey of more than 100,000 voters. source
- confirmed In the AI Policy Institute survey, 50 per cent favoured a controlled slowdown, 33 per cent a halt and 17 per cent faster development. — The percentages appear in the published results; the text also states the wording and date of the question. source
- confirmed OpenAI presented a policy plan on Thursday with commitments to schools, parks and emergency services. — Axios describes the Compute Campus Policy Blueprint and the stated social commitments. source
Editor's note
The election results and local ballots were confirmed by AP and Axios. The opinion figures come from separate surveys with different questions; they do not demonstrate a direct causal link between concerns about AI and voting behaviour.Sources
- Big Tech turns to cash, concessions to offer new AI deal after smackdown — Axios
- Inflation, tariffs and a voter revolt: the midterm verdict on Trump’s economy — Associated Press
- Public Support for Pacing the Frontier — AI Policy Institute
More on this in Dutch media
- AD — „kunstmatige intelligentie”
- RTL Nieuws — „kunstmatige intelligentie”
- FD — „kunstmatige intelligentie”