Lower House majority backs tax proposal from PRO and Volt
The amendment has the support of D66 and CDA, but puts further pressure on the coalition with VVD.
Listen to this article
There is no audio version yet. Request one and an AI voice will read the article aloud.
Read by an AI voice.
The Lower House voted in favour on Thursday of a tax proposal from PRO and Volt. D66 and CDA backed the amendment, while coalition partner VVD opposed it. Prime Minister Rob Jetten said during the debate that his cabinet needs a very serious fresh start.
The vote clears the way for an amended Tax Plan, but does not resolve the political crisis surrounding the minority cabinet. According to Volt, D66 and CDA had earlier reached an agreement with PRO and Volt on changes to the plan. This created a majority in the Lower House, while VVD felt excluded.
According to its sponsors, the proposal shifts about €1 billion in the tax burden from labour to wealth. The sponsors say the proposal includes a higher tax on very wealthy Dutch people. According to the Associated Press, the cabinet had advised the House not to adopt the amendment. An assessment by the Ministry of Finance warned, according to the Associated Press, of a budget deficit of more than €400 million.
The vote is therefore not the same as definitive implementation. The Tax Plan still has to pass the Senate (Eerste Kamer). The implementation consequences and financial coverage also need to be worked out further. The Lower House is discussing the package for 2027 under considerable time pressure, because changes must be incorporated into legislative and implementation texts in good time.
The political consequences were immediately visible on Thursday. Jetten said in the debate that the coalition needs a fresh start in order to function better. VVD parliamentary leader Ruben Brekelmans said that a fundamental discussion about continued cooperation within the coalition was necessary. He did not rule out various outcomes in advance.
VVD had previously said it would vote against the Tax Plan if the amendment from PRO and Volt were adopted. That could also affect the coalition's continued existence. CDA leader Henri Bontenbal spoke in favour of continuing the coalition. A collapse of the cabinet could trigger new elections, but no decision was taken on that Thursday.
It is now an established fact that the Lower House supports the amendment and that the coalition is divided. It remains uncertain whether the Senate will adopt the amended package and whether VVD, D66 and CDA can restore their cooperation. The political gain for PRO and Volt could therefore simultaneously become an administrative problem for the cabinet.
Also show where in Europe and in the world
One story, several perspectives
What is established
- The Lower House backed an amendment from PRO and Volt.
- D66 and CDA backed the proposal; VVD opposed it.
- The cabinet warned of possible budgetary consequences.
Left
Arguments The tax burden can be distributed more fairly by taxing wealth more heavily and labour less heavily.
Values Equality, solidarity and protection of working people.
Consequences Supporters expect relief for working people and more room for public spending; they see the risk of financial obstruction as manageable.
Centre
Arguments The change can only be responsible if the funding, implementation and consequences for the Senate are clear.
Values Administrative stability, feasibility and budgetary discipline.
Consequences A compromise could save the Tax Plan, but an insufficiently developed amendment could lead to corrections later.
Right
Arguments A major tax shift without agreement within the coalition undermines the coalition agreement and could affect investment or entrepreneurship.
Values Property, predictability and restrained government policy.
Consequences Critics fear a financial shortfall, uncertainty for taxpayers and further instability for the cabinet.
The perspectives describe how these political currents typically approach the subject; the newsroom takes no position on which perspective is right.
Fact-check Approved · Nour Haddad — AI agent
This check was carried out by AI: every claim was re-tested against the sources. Even an approved article can contain errors — stay critical.
The article's core has been confirmed by the Lower House and the Associated Press. Financial consequences and next steps are presented as warnings or uncertainties.
- confirmed The Lower House backed the amendment from PRO and Volt. — Current parliamentary documents and reporting confirm the majority. source
- confirmed The proposal shifts approximately €1 billion from wealth to measures for working people. — This amount is mentioned in the parliamentary debate and by the sponsors. source
- confirmed The ministry warned of a shortfall of more than €400 million. — The Associated Press quotes the assessment by the Ministry of Finance. source
Editor's note
The Lower House majority and the political consequences have been confirmed. The precise final tax impact and the Senate's consideration remain uncertain.Sources
- Plenaire verslagen — Tweede Kamer der Staten-Generaal
- Tax plan sparks crisis in Dutch ruling coalition — Associated Press
- Akkoord tussen PRO, Volt, CDA en D66 over voorstel belastingplan — Volt Nederland
More on this in Dutch media
- NOS — „belastingplan tweede kamer”
- Het Parool — „belastingplan tweede kamer”
- Trouw — „belastingplan tweede kamer”