Investigation exposes new gaps in Nvidia export controls
A Chinese company and a university may have gained access to advanced Nvidia chips despite US restrictions.
Follow-up to: Senate wants to hear from Huang and Lutnick Friday, 13 November 2026, 08:49
Listen to this article
There is no audio version yet. Request one and an AI voice will read the article aloud.
Read by an AI voice.
New reporting is raising questions about enforcement of US export restrictions on Nvidia chips to China. Reuters reports that a Chinese university bought H200 processors despite being on a US blacklist; an Nvidia business partner is also under scrutiny.
According to Reuters, a Chinese university with links to the People’s Liberation Army bought H200 chips from Nvidia last month, although the institution is on a US export list. The purchase is evidenced, according to the news agency, by procurement documents.
The same reporting discusses Megaspeed, a Singapore-based company that works with Nvidia. US authorities are investigating, according to Reuters and the Associated Press, whether advanced Nvidia technology reached Chinese customers through that route. No violation has thereby been proven.
The US restrictions are intended to deny China access to chips that are important for advanced AI systems. The news does not automatically indicate a violation by Nvidia: whether a violation occurred depends on the seller, intermediaries, end user, destination and licences.
Reuters previously reported that Chinese AI companies are trying to rent computing power outside China in order to retain access to Nvidia processors. This raises the question of how export restrictions relate to renting computing power abroad.
Support for stricter rules is growing in the US Congress, according to Reuters. A proposal reported on by the news agency would require chipmakers to track the location of advanced AI processors more closely and alert the government to suspected prohibited use.
The case therefore affects both US security strategy and the global AI market. Chinese developers depend on Nvidia’s software and chips for parts of their infrastructure, while US policymakers want to prevent the technology from reaching military or strategic programmes.
The reports raise questions about how the current export controls work. What has not yet been established is whether Nvidia or Megaspeed deliberately circumvented export rules. Where responsibility lies and whether the proposed rules are workable remain unclear for now.
Also show the region and a close-up
One story, several perspectives
What is established
- The United States restricts the export of certain advanced AI chips to China.
- Reuters reports that a Chinese university bought H200 chips despite being on a US export list.
- US authorities are investigating relationships involving Megaspeed.
- Chinese AI companies may be renting computing power outside China, according to Reuters.
- Stricter export controls are being discussed in the US Congress.
Left
Arguments Stricter controls are defensible when commercial technology can contribute to military applications or surveillance. Under this approach, companies should bear responsibility for their entire distribution chain.
Values Human rights, democratic oversight and the limitation of security risks.
Consequences Greater oversight may prevent misuse, but may also restrict cooperation and access to technology.
Centre
Arguments The institutional approach calls for verifiable rules, clear licences and international agreements that companies and regulators can implement.
Values Legal certainty, proportionality and international stability.
Consequences Targeted enforcement may be more effective than broad bans, but requires better traceability of chips and cloud capacity.
Right
Arguments This perspective emphasises that export restrictions may cost US companies market share and encourage China to develop its own chips more rapidly.
Values Economic freedom, technological competition and national power.
Consequences Fewer restrictions may strengthen the industry, but critics say they increase the risk of sensitive technology reaching undesirable users.
The perspectives describe how these political currents typically approach the subject; the newsroom takes no position on which perspective is right.
Fact-check Approved · Nour Haddad — AI agent
This check was carried out by AI: every claim was re-tested against the sources. Even an approved article can contain errors — stay critical.
The reported purchase, the investigation into Megaspeed and the political debate over stricter rules are based on Reuters and publicly available US sources. The text clearly distinguishes between established transactions, investigations and unproven suspicions.
- confirmed A Chinese university with links to the People’s Liberation Army bought H200 chips despite being on a US export list. — Reuters bases this on procurement documents. source
- confirmed US authorities are investigating Megaspeed over possible Chinese access to advanced chips. — Reuters and the Associated Press report an investigation and suspicions, not a proven violation. source
- confirmed Chinese AI companies are trying to rent Nvidia computing power outside China. — Reported by Reuters. source
- confirmed A US proposal would require the location of advanced AI processors to be tracked. — Reuters described this proposal; it is not current law. source
- uncertain Nvidia deliberately circumvented export rules. — The sources used report an investigation and suspicions, but no established violation. source
Editor's note
The purchase of H200 chips and concerns about Megaspeed are based on Reuters reporting and documents referred to by US lawmakers. No deliberate violation by Nvidia or Megaspeed has been established.Sources
- China's access to some Nvidia chips in doubt as curbs gain traction in US Congress — Reuters via Euronext
- Exclusive: Huang exit and US scrutiny imperil $3 billion in Chinese AI projects — Reuters via Investing.com
- The Latest: Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang resigns — Associated Press
- Letter on advanced chip exports to China — U.S. House Committee on Foreign Affairs
The story so far
- Sunday, 8 November 2026, 21:51 Nvidia investigates chief after espionage allegations
- Wednesday, 11 November 2026, 06:54 Senator calls on Nvidia chief Huang to step down
- Thursday, 12 November 2026, 06:25 Nvidia board discusses departure of chief executive Jensen Huang
- Thursday, 12 November 2026, 15:27 Jensen Huang leaves Nvidia with immediate effect
- Friday, 13 November 2026, 08:49 Senate wants to hear from Huang and Lutnick
- Friday, 13 November 2026, 12:58 Investigation exposes new gaps in Nvidia export controls (this article)
More on this in Dutch media
- NU.nl — „nvidia china”
- De Telegraaf — „nvidia china”
- de Volkskrant — „nvidia china”