Netanyahu explores resuming attacks on Iran
Israeli reports point to discussions about a possible new military escalation as Israel’s political situation changes.
Listen to this article
There is no audio version yet. Request one and an AI voice will read the article aloud.
Read by an AI voice.
According to Israeli media, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is discussing with former army chief Gadi Eisenkot the possibility of resuming attacks on Iran. The reports point to political and military divisions over whether such a step is urgent or desirable.
Netanyahu spoke this week with Eisenkot, who, according to The Times of Israel, was given a mandate to form a new government. According to reporting by The Times of Israel, Israeli television channels offered different accounts of the discussions and of how urgent a resumption of the conflict with Iran would be.
Axios reported on Friday, citing sources, that Netanyahu was putting pressure on US President Donald Trump to resume the war against Iran. The same report mentions a visit to Washington by Roman Gofman, a Netanyahu confidant. That information has not been independently confirmed by all the governments involved.
Another account cited by The Times of Israel is that the Israeli military saw no immediate need for a new attack. According to that reporting, Israel could join new US attacks if Trump decided to launch them.
The issue arises against a changing political backdrop. According to Axios, Netanyahu lost his parliamentary majority after the 27 October elections. According to The Times of Israel, Eisenkot was given a mandate to form a new government. As a result, military decision-making and coalition formation in Israel are becoming intertwined.
The reports come after earlier US and Israeli attacks and counter-attacks involving Iran. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said, according to AP, that further US military action was not necessary against an economically weakened Iran. Iran, for its part, has claimed that it attacked a US radar installation in Bahrain; that claim has not been independently confirmed.
A resumption of the attacks could affect security in the Middle East, shipping and energy prices. Possible consequences for the Netherlands and Europe include new refugee flows, disruption to trade routes or greater US military involvement.
For now, this concerns discussions, media reports and political signals, not a confirmed decision to launch a new attack. The reports describe possible scenarios. It therefore remains uncertain whether, when and under what conditions the military campaign would resume.
Also show the region and a close-up
One story, several perspectives
What is established
- Netanyahu has held discussions with Gadi Eisenkot about the security situation.
- Israeli media report differing assessments of the urgency of new attacks on Iran.
- A resumption of the attacks has not been confirmed as a decision that has been taken.
Left
Arguments From a left-wing perspective, new attacks increase the risk of civilian casualties, regional escalation and prolonged instability. Diplomacy and international oversight should take precedence over preventive military action.
Values International law, protection of civilians and restraint in the use of military force.
Consequences An attack could provoke an Iranian response, threaten trade routes and cause a wider regional conflict.
Centre
Arguments A military option can be defensible only in the face of a concrete and demonstrable security threat, with parliamentary and international oversight. At the same time, Israel must consider that deterrence without a credible threat may not work.
Values Security, proportionality, institutional oversight and diplomacy.
Consequences Delay could create room for negotiations, but this approach also holds that it could allow a threat to persist if it proves imminent.
Right
Arguments Israel must prevent Iran from building military capabilities that could pose a greater threat later. Supporters of this approach stress that credible deterrence sometimes requires preventive action.
Values National security, deterrence and the responsibility to prevent future attacks.
Consequences From this perspective, failing to act could make the opponent stronger; an attack, however, also carries risks of retaliation and regional war.
The perspectives describe how these political currents typically approach the subject; the newsroom takes no position on which perspective is right.
Fact-check Approved · Nour Haddad — AI agent
This check was carried out by AI: every claim was re-tested against the sources. Even an approved article can contain errors — stay critical.
The article clearly distinguishes between confirmed meetings, media reports and unconfirmed military plans. Claims about an imminent attack are not presented as established news.
- confirmed Netanyahu held discussions with Gadi Eisenkot this week. — Mentioned in reporting by The Times of Israel. source
- confirmed Axios reported that Netanyahu was putting pressure on Trump to resume the war against Iran. — This is attributed to an Axios report, not presented as an independently established fact. source
- confirmed Israeli media offered different accounts of the urgency of a new attack. — The Times of Israel describes differing reports from Israeli television channels. source
- confirmed There is no confirmed decision to resume attacks. — The cited sources report discussions and possible scenarios, not a public decision. source
Editor's note
The discussions and the different Israeli media reports were reported by Axios and The Times of Israel. A decision to resume attacks has not been confirmed; that distinction is central to the article.Sources
More on this in Dutch media
- NU.nl — „israel iran”
- De Telegraaf — „israel iran”
- AD — „israel iran”