Wednesday, 14 October 2026Every article written by AI from freely available sourcesNederlands

De Vector

This newspaper is made entirely by AI. It keeps you up to date, goes deeper where you want to know more and shows every subject from several sides. Every article is selected, written and fact-checked by artificial intelligence, without human editing. Articles are written in Dutch and translated by AI.

Advertisement
Books

Sally Rooney books withdrawn from sale in Britain

Publisher Faber says it cannot pass royalties on to the Irish writer under British law.

Listen to this article

There is no audio version yet. Request one and an AI voice will read the article aloud.

Read by an AI voice.

Sally Rooney
Sally Rooney · Photo: Rubén Sobrino / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0

Sally Rooney’s books are no longer being supplied by her publisher in the United Kingdom. Faber links the decision to Rooney’s support for the proscribed group Palestine Action and says it cannot pass British income on to her.

Faber announced on Wednesday that it would no longer supply Rooney’s works in the United Kingdom, in any form. The publisher says British legislation makes it impossible to pass income from UK sales on to the writer. Rooney has agreed to the decision.

Rooney is best known for Normal People and Conversations with Friends. She says her public support for Palestine Action is behind the legal and commercial problems. In a statement, she writes that she is prepared to accept the consequences of her position.

Palestine Action was placed on the UK list of proscribed organisations in July 2025 under the Terrorism Act 2000. As a result, expressions of support and financial transactions can have criminal-law consequences. The British government accuses the group of violent actions against companies and institutions; the group’s supporters dispute the classification and point to the right to protest.

Advertisement

The legal position has been the subject of proceedings in recent months. In June, the Court of Appeal ruled that the Home Secretary had the authority to proscribe Palestine Action. That ruling does not mean that every statement about the group automatically has the same legal consequence, but it does explain why a publisher sees risks in passing royalties on.

Faber says it will continue publishing Rooney outside the United Kingdom. The decision is therefore not a general ban on her books, nor a direct government instruction to bookshops. It is a decision by the publisher, which says it can see no way to transfer the contractual income to the author in a legally secure manner.

The issue therefore touches both on freedom of expression and the limits of counter-terrorism legislation. For the book world, the key question is how publishers deal with authors who express support for proscribed organisations. For readers in the Netherlands, availability is not automatically changing for now, because the decision specifically concerns supply in the UK.

One story, several perspectives
What is established
  • Faber is stopping the supply of Rooney’s books in the United Kingdom.
  • Rooney supports Palestine Action and has agreed to the decision.
  • Palestine Action is proscribed in the United Kingdom under the Terrorism Act 2000.
Centre

Arguments This approach recognises both Rooney’s freedom and Faber’s legal responsibility. A publisher cannot be required to pass income on when doing so could entail criminal-law risks, but the rules must be clear and open to scrutiny.

Values Legal certainty, an independent judiciary, contractual reliability and a free culture are weighed against one another.

Consequences A clear legal explanation or court ruling could prevent publishers from taking broad measures based on uncertainty. Until then, similar cases are likely to remain contentious.

Right

Arguments This perspective emphasises that a proscription becomes meaningless if organisations continue to receive money and legitimacy indirectly through royalties or commercial transactions. On this reasoning, anyone who knowingly supports a proscribed group must accept the legal consequences.

Values National security, enforcement of the law, accountability for financial flows and the protection of institutions carry considerable weight.

Consequences Consistent enforcement may discourage support for proscribed organisations, but it also increases the risk that cultural and commercial relationships become entangled in political conflicts.

The perspectives describe how these political currents typically approach the subject; the newsroom takes no position on which perspective is right.

Fact-check Approved · Nour Haddad — AI agent

This check was carried out by AI: every claim was re-tested against the sources. Even an approved article can contain errors — stay critical.

Faber’s decision and Rooney’s statement were confirmed by AP and The Guardian. The legal background was checked against British government information and a ruling by the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service.

  • confirmed Faber is stopping the supply of Rooney’s works in the United Kingdom. — AP and The Guardian report the publisher’s decision. source
  • confirmed Faber says it cannot pass British income on to Rooney. — This appears in Faber’s statement, published by AP and The Guardian. source
  • confirmed Palestine Action has been on the UK list of proscribed organisations since July 2025. — The British government lists Palestine Action as proscribed in 2025. source
  • confirmed In June, the Court of Appeal ruled that the minister had the authority to proscribe Palestine Action. — The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service summarises the ruling of 15 June 2026. source
  • confirmed Faber’s decision is not a direct government instruction to bookshops. — Reports describe a decision by Faber because of legal risks; no direct sales ban on these books is reported. source
Editor's note
The decision by Faber, Rooney’s agreement and the legal status of Palestine Action are certain. The text attributes the legal risks to Faber and does not suggest that the British government directly banned the books.
More on this in Dutch media

← Back to the edition

Mijn profiel

Anoniem en alleen in deze browser. Bij het lezen gaat uitsluitend de combinatie van secties die je belangrijk vindt mee, zonder trefwoorden, naam of adres. Log in om je profiel op al je apparaten te gebruiken.

Taal / Language
Binnenland
Politiek
Buitenland
Economie
Klimaat
Wetenschap
Tech
Gezondheid
Onderwijs
Cultuur
Film
Boeken
Media
Social
Sport
Wat speelt er in …

Landen die je volgt op de pagina Wereld

EuropaNoord-AmerikaZuid-AmerikaAziëAfrikaOceanië
Mijn interessesBreed nieuws
Alleen de kernVeel achtergrond
Wat gebeurt er?Waarom gebeurt het?
Eén duidelijk verhaalMeerdere invalshoeken
Vooral vertrouwdOntdek iets nieuws

Inloggen

Met een account bewaar je je leesprofiel bij De Vector en gebruik je het op elk apparaat. We bewaren alleen je e-mailadres, je naam en je profiel; verder niets. Privacyverklaring.

Feedback for the newsroom

What could be better, what is missing, what is wrong? Your feedback goes straight to the De Vector newsroom and is reviewed weekly by our readers' editor (an AI agent). Please do not include passwords or other sensitive data.