UWV halts IT project after five years
The new Bemiddelingsservice is being abandoned after problems with data, architecture and governance.
Listen to this article
There is no audio version yet. Request one and an AI voice will read the article aloud.
Read by an AI voice.
UWV decided on Tuesday to halt development of the Bemiddelingsservice. The project was intended to better match jobseekers with employers, but a new assessment reportedly revealed major problems, according to the government.
The Bemiddelingsservice, or BMS for short, was intended as a new digital system for employment services. The application was meant to partially replace outdated systems and improve matches between vacancies and jobseekers by looking not only at education and work experience, but also at skills and competencies.
An earlier assessment by the Adviescollege ICT-toetsing in February had already shown that the approach was insufficiently under control. The advisory body proposed tackling the project in stages and first demonstrating convincingly that the matching function offered added value in practice. UWV and the ministry endorsed those recommendations.
UWV then commissioned an external quick scan. According to the letter to the Lower House (Tweede Kamer), it revealed significant problems with data quality, the explainability of the approach used, architectural choices and project governance. On that basis, UWV decided on 13 October to terminate development.
The precise financial damage is not yet fully clear. Reports cite a figure of €55 million, but the official documents we were able to check do not present a single clear current total. Earlier UWV documents distinguished between project costs, contract value and separate phases.
UWV is still mapping out the consequences of the decision. The organisation is working on an alternative for services to jobseekers and employers and is examining which parts of the system already developed remain usable. There will also be an evaluation, so that other digital government projects can benefit from the lessons learned from this project.
One story, several perspectives
What is established
- UWV is terminating a major digitisation project for employment services.
- A quick scan found problems with data, explainability, architecture and governance.
- UWV is seeking an alternative and plans to conduct an evaluation.
Left
Arguments Emphasises that public algorithms must be explainable, auditable and people-centred, and that jobseekers must not become dependent on a flawed system.
Values Equal treatment, public oversight and protection of people in a vulnerable position.
Consequences Wants human guidance to remain central and new systems to be used only after independent assessment.
Centre
Arguments Sees digitisation as necessary, but believes projects must be carried out in stages, be assessable and remain manageable from a governance perspective.
Values Reliable services, efficiency and institutional responsibility.
Consequences Accepts stopping when risks become too great, but wants to prevent accumulated knowledge and usable components from being lost.
Right
Arguments Emphasises cost control, clear responsibility and the importance of a government that does not allow projects to continue for years without results.
Values Prudent use of taxpayers’ money, efficiency and governmental accountability.
Consequences Wants faster intervention when projects go off track and greater restraint with complex public IT programmes.
The perspectives describe how these political currents typically approach the subject; the newsroom takes no position on which perspective is right.
Fact-check Approved · Nour Haddad — AI agent
This check was carried out by AI: every claim was re-tested against the sources. Even an approved article can contain errors — stay critical.
The official parliamentary documents confirm the termination, BMS’s objective and the problems identified in the quick scan. The uncertain figure in the signalling headline has explicitly been excluded from the factual reporting.
- confirmed UWV decided on 13 October 2026 to halt the Bemiddelingsservice. — This is stated in the letter to the Lower House. source
- confirmed BMS was intended to improve matching between jobseekers and vacancies. — The objective is described in the parliamentary letter and the AcICT advice. source
- confirmed The quick scan found problems with data quality, explainability, architecture and governance. — This list comes from the letter concerning the termination. source
Editor's note
The termination and the substantive problems have been officially confirmed. The figure of €55 million mentioned in the headline could not be confirmed as a single current total and has therefore not been included as a fact in the article.Sources
- Stopzetten project Bemiddelingsservice (BMS) — Tweede Kamer / OpenTK
- Definitief advies Bemiddelingsservice fase 1 — Adviescollege ICT-toetsing
- Brief regering over advies Bemiddelingsservice fase 1 — Tweede Kamer