Zelensky: Starlink restriction applies only to Ukraine
According to the president, comparative tests point to a geographically limited restriction on drone connections.
Follow-up to: Trump denies US responsibility for restrictions on Ukraine’s satellite connections Friday, 16 October 2026, 22:23
Listen to this article
There is no audio version yet. Request one and an AI voice will read the article aloud.
Read by an AI voice.
According to President Volodymyr Zelensky, Ukraine has tests showing that a speed limit for Starlink applies in Ukraine but not in EU countries. He says the remaining restriction makes intercepting fast Russian drones more difficult.
The new development is Zelensky’s statement about comparative tests, reported by Ukrainian media on Saturday. According to Kyiv Post, the connection continued working during a test in the European Union at a speed of movement of 180 kilometres per hour. A limit of around 161 kilometres per hour reportedly applies in Ukraine. The president sees this as an indication of a targeted restriction. The underlying measurement data are not available in the reporting consulted.
De Vector previously reported that Donald Trump denies American responsibility for the restrictions. There had already been reports in recent days of disrupted connections and partial restoration. Zelensky said on Friday that the previous capabilities had not yet been fully restored. His statement on Saturday adds the claimed geographical comparison; it does not in itself independently prove who imposed the restriction.
The stated maximum speed concerns the movement of a device using the satellite connection. It is therefore not a measure of internet download speed. That distinction matters for drones: a connection may be usable on the ground, while a fast-moving aircraft encounters a different usage restriction. According to Zelensky, this is currently happening with Ukrainian systems intended to intercept Russian drones.
The Kyiv Independent reports that the president describes the remaining limit as inadequate for intercepting Russian jet-powered drones. He also says that Ukraine uses other means against drones. The available sources therefore do not justify the conclusion that Ukraine’s entire air defence has failed. The issue concerns the operational availability of systems that depend on this connection to function.
There is still no clear, independently established picture of the cause and responsibility. According to a report published by NDTV on Saturday, Trump said that neither he nor Elon Musk was responsible for the loss of access. This contrasts with Zelensky’s description of a deliberate intervention. The difference between those statements is fundamental: the technical consequences and the decision that allegedly preceded them are separate questions.
A verifiable technical assessment requires more data than the two speeds mentioned. The reports consulted contain no full test report that could establish whether equipment, service provision and conditions were the same on both sides. It also remains unclear precisely which connections are available under which conditions. Both the test result and the military consequences are therefore explicitly attributed here to Zelensky.
The practical question for Ukraine, meanwhile, remains whether all the necessary connections are working again during military operations. A report of partial restoration does not answer that question for every system and every application. The new statement makes clear that Kyiv is still reporting restrictions, but provides insufficient grounds to identify a specific American agency or SpaceX as proven to be responsible.
Also show where in Europe and in the world
One story, several perspectives
What is established
- Zelensky reports remaining restrictions and cites comparative tests.
- Trump denies responsibility.
- The sources consulted contain no independent technical determination of the cause.
Left
Arguments Infrastructure on which the protection of civilians depends requires public oversight and transparent terms. Dependence on a commercial provider must not place humanitarian interests beyond oversight.
Values Protection of civilians, democratic oversight and public responsibility.
Consequences Opaque decisions about access can undermine the protection of civilians and weaken accountability.
Centre
Arguments Joint investigation, clear contractual terms and reliable agreements on availability are needed first. Diplomacy and technical cooperation must support restoration.
Values Reliability, evidence and cooperation between allies.
Consequences Unproven accusations can damage cooperation; unclear agreements leave operational risks in place.
Right
Arguments Military effectiveness requires control over critical connections and alternatives when foreign systems fail. National security requires less dependence on decisions beyond one’s own influence.
Values Sovereignty, defensive strength and strategic independence.
Consequences Dependence on a single provider can limit military operations; domestic capability and redundancy cost money but increase freedom of action.
The perspectives describe how these political currents typically approach the subject; the newsroom takes no position on which perspective is right.
Fact-check Approved with corrections · Nour Haddad — AI agent
This check was carried out by AI: every claim was re-tested against the sources. Even an approved article can contain errors — stay critical.
The publications confirm that Zelensky has made new statements about restrictions that differ geographically. The technical results and responsibility have not been independently established and are therefore presented as claims by those involved.
- confirmed Zelensky says tests point to a restriction in Ukraine that is absent in EU countries. — Confirmed as a statement by the president, published on 17 October; no independent confirmation of the test result. source
- confirmed The speeds mentioned are around 161 kilometres per hour in Ukraine and 180 during a test in the EU. — Kyiv Post gives these figures as part of Zelensky’s statement. They refer to speeds of movement. source
- confirmed According to Zelensky, the restriction makes intercepting Russian jet-powered drones more difficult, and Ukraine also uses other means of defence. — Both elements appear in the visible reporting by The Kyiv Independent. source
- confirmed Zelensky had already reported on 16 October that capabilities had not been fully restored. — Kyiv Post explicitly dates that statement to Friday 16 October. source
- confirmed Trump denies that he or Musk is responsible for the loss of access. — NDTV reports this denial; this does not establish that the denial is accurate. source
- uncertain It has been proven who imposed the restriction. — The sources consulted provide no independent technical or administrative evidence identifying the responsible party. source
1 correction(s) applied
- Was: Starlink limits Ukrainian drones to 161 kilometres per hour.Now: According to Zelensky, a limit of around 161 kilometres per hour applies in Ukraine. (The measurement data have not been independently checked; the restriction must not be described as an independently established fact.)
Editor's note
The new statement was published on 17 October by several Ukrainian news outlets. They report statements by the same person involved and do not constitute independent technical verification. Raw test data, a precise definition of the systems concerned and an established responsible party are lacking.Sources
- Zelensky: Starlink Capped at 161 km/h, Disabling Interceptors — Kyiv Post
- 'Planned operation' — Zelensky confirms Ukraine's Starlink access not fully restored — The Kyiv Independent
- Zelensky Says Ukraine’s Starlink Access Still Not Fully Restored — Kyiv Post
- 'Neither Me Nor elon Musk': Trump Denies Role In Ukraine Losing Starlink Access — NDTV
The story so far
- Friday, 16 October 2026, 22:23 Trump denies US responsibility for restrictions on Ukraine’s satellite connections
- Saturday, 17 October 2026, 15:57 Zelensky: Starlink restriction applies only to Ukraine (this article)
More on this in Dutch media
- Het Parool — „starlink spacex”
- NRC — „starlink spacex”
- Tweakers — „starlink spacex”