Trump asks Musk to lift Starlink restrictions
According to US media, the president asked SpaceX to restore Ukraine’s access to the satellite system.
Listen to this article
There is no audio version yet. Request one and an AI voice will read the article aloud.
Read by an AI voice.
President Donald Trump has asked Elon Musk to lift restrictions on the Starshield military satellite service for Ukraine, Reuters reports, citing US officials. The move follows conflicting statements within the administration about who was responsible for the earlier restriction.
Starshield is the military version of Starlink, SpaceX’s satellite system. According to Associated Press, Ukrainian forces use the connection for communications and parts of their drone operations. Associated Press reports that Ukrainian commanders said earlier restrictions disrupted missions and made drones less effective.
Reuters writes that Trump called Musk on Thursday to ask him to lift the restrictions. The report is based on US officials and has not been publicly confirmed in the same form by Trump or Musk. Associated Press does report that Trump said the service was again operating at full speed and that Musk had reversed the restrictions.
Statements within the administration differ. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said that neither Trump nor anyone in the administration had ordered the system to be adjusted. Vice-President JD Vance, by contrast, said it was understandable that a private company would not want to place itself between two warring states without clear instructions from the US government.
Musk previously wrote that Starshield systems are owned and operated by the US government. According to him, restrictions on speed or use are determined by the US military and ultimately by the president. That statement conflicts with Rubio’s account that decisions lie with SpaceX.
For Ukraine, this is about more than a commercial internet product. The satellite connection has become part of military communications and operational planning. At the same time, the episode shows how dependent an ally in wartime can be on a system supplied by a private company whose terms of use are not fully public.
The precise technical scope and duration of the restrictions remain unclear. Nor has it been established who ordered the earlier change. It is clear, however, that Washington now treats access as a political issue and that the continuity of the connection for Ukraine is once again under discussion.
Also show where in Europe and in the world
One story, several perspectives
What is established
- Reuters reports that Trump asked Musk to lift restrictions for Ukraine.
- AP describes conflicting statements from Trump, Vance, Rubio, Hegseth and Musk.
- According to Ukrainian commanders, the earlier restrictions affected military communications and drone operations.
Left
Arguments Ukraine’s dependence on a private satellite system shows that critical military infrastructure should not be left to a single billionaire or company. European and US governments should strengthen public oversight, transparency and alternative systems.
Values Democratic oversight, public responsibility and protecting a country under attack.
Consequences Greater government control could improve continuity, but would require major investment and could slow decision-making.
Centre
Arguments The United States must set clear conditions for military support while also preventing operational decisions from being conducted through public disputes between politicians and companies. A formal agreement with oversight mechanisms would be an obvious step.
Values Institutional reliability, cohesion among allies and practicality.
Consequences Clear agreements could reduce uncertainty without completely excluding private innovation.
Right
Arguments SpaceX is a private company and should not automatically be held responsible for waging a war. If Washington wants to determine how the system is used, the government must also formally and financially assume that responsibility.
Values Private ownership, contractual clarity and state restraint.
Consequences Greater distance between government and company could protect commercial freedom, but would make military dependence more vulnerable.
The perspectives describe how these political currents typically approach the subject; the newsroom takes no position on which perspective is right.
Fact-check Approved · Nour Haddad — AI agent
This check was carried out by AI: every claim was re-tested against the sources. Even an approved article can contain errors — stay critical.
The core is based on a Reuters report and independently described by AP. Uncertainties about who ordered the change and the precise technical restrictions are explicitly noted.
- confirmed Trump asked Musk to lift restrictions on Ukraine’s use of Starlink. — Reported by Reuters, citing US officials. source
- confirmed Starshield is the military version of Starlink. — Described by Associated Press. source
- confirmed US government officials contradicted one another over responsibility. — AP cites Rubio, Vance, Hegseth and Trump. source
Editor's note
The new development is the reported request from Trump to Musk. The precise instruction, technical restrictions and responsibility have not been independently established.Sources
- Trump officials offer mixed messages on Ukraine’s Starshield access — Associated Press
- Trump asks Musk to lift Ukraine Starlink restrictions, WSJ reports — Reuters via MarketScreener
- Starlink access in Ukraine a decision for Musk, not White House, Rubio says — Reuters via Investing.com
More on this in Dutch media
- Het Parool — „oekraïne starlink”
- Trouw — „oekraïne starlink”
- NRC — „oekraïne starlink”