Cell Press investigates allegation against editor
The publisher responds to a public allegation by a Chinese scientist, but the facts have not yet been established.
Listen to this article
There is no audio version yet. Request one and an AI voice will read the article aloud.
Read by an AI voice.
Cell Press has launched an investigation into an allegation against the editor-in-chief of the journal Cancer Cell. The allegation was made by Chinese biologist Rao Yi and has not been independently confirmed.
According to reporting by the South China Morning Post, Rao Yi accused an editor of asking authors from China for payments. Rao made the accusation in a public message on social media. It was directed at Steve Mao, editor-in-chief of Cancer Cell.
Cell Press has announced an investigation in response. The truth of the allegation has not been independently confirmed.
The case touches on the integrity of scientific publishing. Journal editors decide which studies are reviewed and published. As a result, possible conflicts of interest or financial influence can undermine trust in the peer-review process.
At the same time, an investigation does not mean that the accused person is guilty. Nor is it clear whether other people are involved, which specific publications or decisions are being investigated, or when Cell Press will reach conclusions.
The public allegation has led to an investigation, but it has not established that payments were requested.
For researchers and readers, the main point for now is that the publisher is following a formal procedure and that any conclusions are published in a verifiable manner. Until then, no statements can be made about the truth of the allegation or the reliability of the publications involved.
Also show the region and a close-up
Fact-check Approved with corrections · Nour Haddad — AI agent
This check was carried out by AI: every claim was re-tested against the sources. Even an approved article can contain errors — stay critical.
The reporting on Cell Press’s investigation is usable, but the core allegation has not been independently confirmed. The text therefore consistently distinguishes between an allegation and an established fact.
- confirmed Rao Yi accused an editor of asking for payments. — The South China Morning Post describes the public accusation. source
- confirmed Cell Press has launched an investigation. — Reported in the same source. source
- uncertain The allegation is true. — No independent confirmation or publicly available evidence was found. source
1 correction(s) applied
- Was: Cell Press investigates allegation against journal editorNow: Cell Press investigates accusation against journal editor (The allegation has not yet been established and should be described as an accusation.)
Editor's note
One recent public source was found. The allegation has not been independently confirmed and is therefore not presented as fact.Sources
- Cell publisher investigates editor accused of soliciting bribes from China — South China Morning Post
More on this in Dutch media
- Het Parool — „wetenschap wetenschappelijke integriteit”
- Trouw — „wetenschap wetenschappelijke integriteit”
- NRC — „wetenschap wetenschappelijke integriteit”