Millions in Dutch healthcare funds went to Spanish family home
Investigation reveals new details about young people allegedly seriously abused there, according to former clients.
Listen to this article
There is no audio version yet. Request one and an AI voice will read the article aloud.
Read by an AI voice.
For years, Dutch organisations sent young people with behavioural problems to a family home in Spain that received tens of millions of euros in Dutch healthcare funding. New testimonies and earlier oversight warnings raise questions about the responsibility of municipalities, youth protection agencies and care providers.
The facility is Huize Soria in the Valencia region. Nieuwsuur previously reported that Dutch young people stayed there despite warnings about a repressive culture and potentially unsafe treatment methods. A new investigation also describes how the family home received tens of millions of euros in Dutch healthcare funding over roughly twenty years.
According to the reports, former clients describe serious abuse and humiliation. As they are former minor clients, we are not including details that could identify them. The experiences described are allegations by former clients; this does not establish who is legally or administratively responsible.
According to the investigation, Dutch organisations had been aware of concerns earlier. Nieuwsuur previously reported that independent experts described a repressive culture and that the Dutch Health and Youth Care Inspectorate was aware of warnings.
The IGJ oversees healthcare in the Netherlands, but cannot intervene directly in Spain. The inspectorate can, however, share information with Spanish regulators. Nieuwsuur reported that contact between the Dutch and Spanish inspectorates about the facility was limited for years.
According to earlier reports, the Spanish inspectorate eventually intervened and had the family home closed. A closure can also affect continuity of care for young people staying there.
The case touches on a broader question about cross-border youth care. It is not clear here which consent rules have applied since 2022 to organisations placing young people in another country within the European Union. The division of responsibility between municipalities, certified institutions, care providers and regulators also requires clarification.
The new figure for healthcare funding makes the financial aspect of the case visible, but does not in itself show that every payment was unlawful. Contracts, oversight files and any court rulings would be needed for that. The reports also raise the question of what conditions funders imposed regarding the safety of care.
Also show where in Europe and in the world
One story, several perspectives
What is established
- Dutch young people were placed in a family home in Spain.
- There had previously been warnings about safety and the treatment culture.
- The Spanish inspectorate intervened and had the facility closed.
- The financial scale of the healthcare payments is now being highlighted again.
Left
Arguments Vulnerable young people must never depend on a system in which institutions can evade oversight by operating across borders. The government must strengthen public youth care and make profit and cost incentives subordinate to children's rights.
Values Children's rights, protection and public responsibility.
Consequences More oversight and small-scale care may be more expensive, but reduce the risk of abuses continuing for a long time.
Centre
Arguments Cross-border care may sometimes be necessary, but only with clear responsibilities, the host country's consent and independent inspections. The first task is to establish exactly what happened and who knew which warnings.
Values Carefulness, proportionality and administrative oversight.
Consequences An improved oversight framework could allow foreign placements to continue without creating an oversight vacuum.
Right
Arguments The central issue is that organisations and administrators must be held responsible when they ignore the rules. Contracts, oversight and enforcement must become more transparent, while good providers should not be affected by blanket bans.
Values Responsibility, legal certainty and efficiency.
Consequences Stricter liability could bring abuses to light more quickly, but could also lead to fewer places being available.
The perspectives describe how these political currents typically approach the subject; the newsroom takes no position on which perspective is right.
Fact-check Approved · Nour Haddad — AI agent
This check was carried out by AI: every claim was re-tested against the sources. Even an approved article can contain errors — stay critical.
The financial claim and the new testimonies are based on Nieuwsuur's reporting as summarised by a second outlet. The role of individual organisations and the legal assessment of the allegations have not been presented as established facts.
- confirmed Huize Soria received tens of millions of euros in Dutch healthcare funding over roughly twenty years. — Mentioned in the reporting by Rijswijks Dagblad, based on Nieuwsuur's investigation. source
- confirmed Dutch inspectorates were aware of earlier warnings about the facility. — NOS Nieuwsuur described earlier warnings and contact with the IGJ. source
- confirmed The Spanish inspectorate had the family home closed. — This appears in a separate NOS publication. source
Editor's note
The new financial claim comes from an investigation summarised by a regional outlet; the earlier oversight warnings and closure were reported by NOS Nieuwsuur. Allegations by former clients have been presented as allegations.Sources
More on this in Dutch media
- AD — „jeugdzorg huize soria”
- de Volkskrant — „jeugdzorg huize soria”
- RTL Nieuws — „jeugdzorg huize soria”