New revelations of abuse at Huize Soria
Dutch young people were reportedly seriously abused in a Spanish family home; organisations announce investigations.
Listen to this article
There is no audio version yet. Request one and an AI voice will read the article aloud.
Read by an AI voice.
Dutch young people who stayed at the Spanish family home Huize Soria describe serious abuse and humiliation. According to an investigation by Nieuwsuur, Dutch organisations placed young people there for years, while signals about safety concerns were allegedly not followed up adequately.
Huize Soria was a Dutch family home in Spain for young people with complex behavioural problems. Nieuwsuur reports that several former residents describe treatment they experienced as abuse. The reports cover a period of around 20 years.
The young people had been placed in youth care in the Netherlands because they could not grow up safely at home or needed intensive guidance. Defence for Children writes that they encountered unsafe conditions again at the residential facility. The organisation speaks of a serious failure of the system, but the precise responsibility of each institution involved has yet to be established.
According to Nieuwsuur, Dutch municipalities, child protection organisations and care providers would have been aware at various points of the way the home operated and of warning signs. It has not been established that every organisation had access to all the information or made the same decisions.
SAVE Jeugdbescherming, which placed young people at Huize Soria in the past, says an independent investigation is nearly complete. The organisation expects the findings at the end of October and wants to use them to examine what decisions were made, what was known and how signals were handled.
Defence for Children and UNICEF Nederland are also calling for an independent investigation into the placements and the way reports from young people were handled. They point to the special responsibility of institutions that protect children on behalf of the government.
The Spanish inspectorate previously ordered Huize Soria to stop providing youth care immediately because, according to the inspectorate, the home did not have the proper licences. That decision is separate from the question of whether individual staff members or directors bear criminal responsibility. No definitive ruling on that is yet known.
The case could have implications for the supervision of youth care abroad. Until the announced investigations have been completed, it is not fully clear how many young people were involved, which organisations received which signals and which measures had previously been considered.
Also show where in Europe and in the world
One story, several perspectives
What is established
- Former residents have reported serious abuse and humiliation.
- Dutch organisations placed young people in the Spanish family home.
- Investigations into decision-making and supervision are under way or have been announced.
Left
Arguments The government and institutions have a special duty towards children entrusted to youth care. Independent investigation, redress for victims and stronger public oversight must come first.
Values Children’s rights, protection and public responsibility.
Consequences More oversight and redress could restore trust, but would also require additional money and capacity.
Centre
Arguments The facts must be established carefully for each organisation and period. There is a need for independent investigation, clear lines of supervision and improvements without assigning blame in advance.
Values Carefulness, legal protection and accountable governance.
Consequences A factual reconstruction could produce targeted improvements and prevent new measures from being based on incomplete information.
Right
Arguments The government must take tougher action against institutions that break the rules and clearly establish who is responsible. Youth care must not disappear into a chain in which no one can be held to account.
Values Responsibility, enforcement and order.
Consequences Stricter licensing requirements and sanctions could reduce risks, but must not allow specialised care to disappear without an alternative.
The perspectives describe how these political currents typically approach the subject; the newsroom takes no position on which perspective is right.
Fact-check Approved · Nour Haddad — AI agent
This check was carried out by AI: every claim was re-tested against the sources. Even an approved article can contain errors — stay critical.
The reports and announced investigations have been confirmed by several organisations involved and by Nieuwsuur. Allegations concerning individual responsibility have deliberately been presented as unproven or still under investigation.
- confirmed Dutch young people describe serious abuse and humiliation at Huize Soria. — Reported by Nieuwsuur and summarised by Defence for Children. source
- confirmed SAVE is announcing an investigation and expects the findings at the end of October. — Stated in the declaration by SAVE Jeugdbescherming. source
- confirmed The Spanish inspectorate ordered the family home to stop immediately because it lacked the required licences. — Reported by Nieuwsuur. source
Editor's note
The reports of abuse come from journalistic investigation and statements by former residents. Investigations into the responsibility of the organisations involved have not yet been completed; legal conclusions have therefore been avoided.Sources
- Tientallen miljoenen jeugdzorggeld naar extreme behandelmethode in Spanje — NOS Nieuwsuur
- Kinderrechtenschendingen Huize Soria — Defence for Children Nederland
- Vragen of zorgen over de berichtgeving over SAVE Jeugdbescherming? — SAVE Jeugdbescherming
- Spaanse inspectie grijpt in: Nederlands gezinshuis moet per direct dicht — NOS Nieuwsuur
More on this in Dutch media
- de Volkskrant — „jeugdzorg huize soria”
- RTL Nieuws — „jeugdzorg huize soria”
- NOS — „jeugdzorg huize soria”