New complaint against Philip Morris over heated tobacco
Stichting Rookpreventie Jeugd accuses the manufacturer of misleading people about a heated-tobacco product.
Listen to this article
There is no audio version yet. Request one and an AI voice will read the article aloud.
Read by an AI voice.
Stichting Rookpreventie Jeugd is filing another complaint against Philip Morris. The foundation accuses the tobacco producer of fraud and misleading consumers in its promotion of heated tobacco.
According to the foundation, the new complaint will be handed to the Public Prosecution Service in mid-November. Pulmonologist Wanda de Kanter and lawyer Bénédicte Ficq are involved in the case. The accusations concern the way Philip Morris presents its heated-tobacco product as an alternative to ordinary cigarettes.
With heated tobacco, tobacco is warmed in an electronic device instead of being burned. The foundation argues that the way the product is presented may give consumers an overly reassuring impression of the health risks. That is the complainants’ allegation.
The case follows an earlier complaint filed in 2016 against Philip Morris and other tobacco producers. According to Rookpreventie Jeugd, the current case concerns a new product and new marketing statements. It is not yet known whether the Public Prosecution Service will open a criminal investigation.
Dutch rules on tobacco advertising prohibit health claims that may mislead consumers. At the same time, an advertising ban does not mean that every heated-tobacco product is legally equivalent to an ordinary cigarette. The precise assessment depends on the claims used, the presentation and the evidence concerning how it works.
No substantive response from Philip Morris to the new complaint is known here. Nor is it known whether the Public Prosecution Service will open an investigation. The case could once again spark debate about how much scope manufacturers have to present alternative nicotine products to adult smokers without attracting new users.
For non-smokers and young people, the position of health organisations remains that nicotine products are harmful and addictive. The new complaint in itself changes nothing about the rules on sales or medical advice; decisions by the competent authorities would be required for that.
Also show where in Europe and in the world
One story, several perspectives
What is established
- The foundation announced a new complaint on 2 November 2026.
- The complaint concerns the marketing of heated tobacco.
- Any criminal assessment by the Public Prosecution Service has yet to take place.
Left
Arguments The government must protect consumers and young people from an industry that presents new nicotine products as a solution.
Values Public health, prevention and limiting commercial influence.
Consequences Greater restrictions on advertising and a higher threshold for new tobacco products are emphasised.
Centre
Arguments Claims must be verifiable and assessed by regulators and the justice system, without prejudging guilt.
Values Legal certainty, evidence and proportionate regulation.
Consequences An independent assessment could clarify which forms of marketing are legally permissible.
Right
Arguments Adult smokers should retain access to alternatives, provided manufacturers make no false claims.
Values Personal responsibility, freedom of choice and predictable rules for businesses.
Consequences A total ban may be seen as disproportionate and potentially counterproductive for existing smokers.
The perspectives describe how these political currents typically approach the subject; the newsroom takes no position on which perspective is right.
Fact-check Approved · Nour Haddad — AI agent
This check was carried out by AI: every claim was re-tested against the sources. Even an approved article can contain errors — stay critical.
The article’s central point has been confirmed by the foundation and an ANP report. The legal characterisations are presented as allegations; there has been no ruling on guilt.
- confirmed Stichting Rookpreventie Jeugd is filing a new complaint against Philip Morris. — Reported by the foundation and ANP. source
- confirmed The complaint concerns misleading claims about heated tobacco. — Stated in the foundation’s announcement. source
- uncertain The Public Prosecution Service has not yet announced an investigation. — Not found in the sources consulted; it has therefore been phrased cautiously. source
Editor's note
It is certain that Rookpreventie Jeugd has announced a new complaint and what it concerns. It is uncertain whether the Public Prosecution Service will open an investigation and how Philip Morris will respond.Sources
- Rookpreventie Jeugd doet aangifte tegen Philip Morris — Stichting Rookpreventie Jeugd
- Aangifte longarts De Kanter en advocaat Ficq tegen Philip Morris — ANP via ZeelandNet
- Verboden claims over verhitte tabak in zaken gesteund door Philip Morris — NOS
More on this in Dutch media
- NOS — „verhitte tabak”
- Het Parool — „verhitte tabak”
- Trouw — „verhitte tabak”