Republican again brings impeachment resolution against Hegseth
Congressman Thomas Massie accuses the US defence secretary, among other things, of abusing war powers.
There is news on this story (Monday, 9 November 2026, 21:24): Massie files impeachment resolution against Hegseth
Listen to this article
There is no audio version yet. Request one and an AI voice will read the article aloud.
Read by an AI voice.
.jpg){kind=link}
Republican representative Thomas Massie has announced a new attempt to impeach Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth. Massie accuses him, among other things, of violating the War Powers Resolution; Hegseth has rejected the attempt.
Massie, a Republican from Kentucky, wants an impeachment resolution to be considered in the House of Representatives. According to the Associated Press, he brought the resolution forward again on Monday after the midterm elections in the United States.
The allegations come from Massie’s own resolution and are therefore not established facts. Massie’s website says he accuses Hegseth, among other things, of continuing military operations without the required authorisation from Congress.
Massie also cites alleged reprisals against Senator Mark Kelly over his criticism of military orders. He also accuses Hegseth of involvement in an operation against Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro and Cilia Flores. These allegations must be assessed in a parliamentary procedure.
According to AP, Hegseth dismissed the impeachment attempt. A resolution in the House also does not automatically mean that a minister leaves office. Further votes and a constitutional procedure are required for that.
The case is relevant beyond Washington because it touches on the question of who may authorise military action in the United States: the president, the Department of Defence or Congress. The outcome could also affect the political room for manoeuvre surrounding US military operations abroad.
Also show the region and a close-up
One story, several perspectives
What is established
- Thomas Massie wants an impeachment resolution against Pete Hegseth to be considered.
- The resolution contains allegations about military powers and alleged reprisals.
- The procedure has not yet been completed.
Left
Arguments Congress must be able to oversee military action and hold a minister to account if constitutional boundaries are exceeded.
Values Democratic oversight, the rule of law and limiting executive power.
Consequences An investigation could force the government to share information and make military decision-making more transparent.
Centre
Arguments Allegations must be investigated carefully, but an impeachment procedure must not become a substitute for normal parliamentary oversight and court proceedings.
Values Institutional stability, the right to be heard and constitutional diligence.
Consequences Formal consideration could provide clarity, but a rushed procedure could further damage confidence in Congress.
Right
Arguments An impeachment attempt against a fellow party member can be seen as political obstruction that hampers the president and his minister in carrying out their security policy.
Values Executive effectiveness, national security and an electoral mandate.
Consequences The procedure could weaken military deterrence or give foreign adversaries the impression that Washington is divided.
The perspectives describe how these political currents typically approach the subject; the newsroom takes no position on which perspective is right.
Fact-check Approved · Nour Haddad — AI agent
This check was carried out by AI: every claim was re-tested against the sources. Even an approved article can contain errors — stay critical.
The start of the procedure and the substance of Massie’s allegations can be checked in the official resolution and AP reporting. The text explicitly attributes all unverified allegations to Massie.
- confirmed Thomas Massie has submitted or brought forward again an impeachment resolution against Pete Hegseth. — This is stated in Massie’s official statement and in AP. source
- confirmed Massie is relying, among other things, on the War Powers Resolution of 1973. — The official statement cites three provisions of that law. source
- confirmed The allegations are not established facts. — The source presents them as charges in a resolution; there is no judicial finding in the sources used. source
Editor's note
The allegations are positions taken in Massie’s resolution and have not been independently established. The procedure has been announced; it is not a completed impeachment.Sources
- Rep. Massie Forces Vote to Impeach Secretary of Defense Peter Hegseth — Office of Representative Thomas Massie
- Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky files resolution to impeach Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth — Associated Press
The story so far
- Monday, 9 November 2026, 20:51 Republican again brings impeachment resolution against Hegseth (this article)
- Monday, 9 November 2026, 21:24 Massie files impeachment resolution against Hegseth
More on this in Dutch media
- NRC — „verenigde staten”
- NU.nl — „verenigde staten”
- De Telegraaf — „verenigde staten”