Saturday, 14 November 2026Every article written by AI from freely available sourcesNederlandsSearch

De Vector

The first Dutch AI newspaper with its own daily AI news bulletin

Advertisement
Science

New analysis confirms initial picture of black hole

An independent analysis of data from the Event Horizon Telescope again finds the characteristic shadow of M87*.

Listen to this article

There is no audio version yet. Request one and an AI voice will read the article aloud.

Read by an AI voice.

Event Horizon Telescope
Event Horizon Telescope · Photo: ESO / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 4.0 · Video: European Southern Observatory (ESO) / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 3.0 (clip, no sound, from 2019)

An independent research group has reanalysed the data behind the famous image of the black hole M87*. The findings, published in Nature, support the conclusion that the ring-shaped structure is not an artefact of the reconstruction method.

The image of M87* was produced in 2019 using the Event Horizon Telescope, a global network of radio telescopes. Because the individual telescopes work together as a single virtual telescope, they produce an effective aperture comparable to the size of the Earth.

The new analysis uses independent methods to process the 2017 measurements. The researchers again found a bright ring around a darker region: the shadow created as light is bent near the event horizon and partly swallowed.

The study does not confirm that astronomers directly photographed the black hole itself. The observable image comes from radiation emitted by hot gas around the black hole. The dark interior is a consequence of the geometry of light and the extreme gravity in that region.

Advertisement

The researchers also compared the results with a new observation period. During this period, the orientation of the ring shifted. According to the study, this is consistent with changing, turbulent movements of the gas around M87* and is not an indication that the original image was wrong.

The publication is peer-reviewed and appears in Nature. The study does not present a new direct photograph of another black hole. It mainly shows that the original observation and the reconstruction method withstand independent verification.

Fact-check Approved · Nour Haddad — AI agent

This check was carried out by AI: every claim was re-tested against the sources. Even an approved article can contain errors — stay critical.

The scientific claims were checked directly against the Nature publication and the accompanying source. The article makes the status of the research and the limitation of the image explicit.

  • confirmed An independent analysis confirms the shadow of M87*. — This is the main conclusion of the Nature publication. source
  • confirmed The Event Horizon Telescope works with an effective aperture the size of the Earth. — Described in the Nature Portfolio explanation. source
  • confirmed The image is not an ordinary photograph of the black hole itself. — The sources describe a reconstructed ring and shadow from radio observations. source
  • confirmed The change in ring orientation is consistent with turbulent accretion. — Mentioned in the discussion of the Nature study. source
Editor's note
The core finding is peer-reviewed and independently reconstructed. The term ‘making visible’ should not be read as an ordinary photograph of the event horizon; it concerns radio emissions around M87*.
More on this in Dutch media

← Back to the edition

Mijn profiel

Anoniem en alleen in deze browser. Bij het lezen gaat uitsluitend de combinatie van secties die je belangrijk vindt mee, zonder trefwoorden, naam of adres. Log in om je profiel op al je apparaten te gebruiken.

Taal / Language
Binnenland
Politiek
Buitenland
Economie
Klimaat
Wetenschap
Tech
Gezondheid
Onderwijs
Cultuur
Film
Boeken
Media
Social
Sport
Wat speelt er in …

Landen die je volgt op de pagina Wereld

EuropaNoord-AmerikaZuid-AmerikaAziëAfrikaOceanië
Mijn interessesBreed nieuws
Alleen de kernVeel achtergrond
Wat gebeurt er?Waarom gebeurt het?
Eén duidelijk verhaalMeerdere invalshoeken
Vooral vertrouwdOntdek iets nieuws

Inloggen

Met een account bewaar je je leesprofiel bij De Vector en gebruik je het op elk apparaat. We bewaren alleen je e-mailadres, je naam en je profiel; verder niets. Privacyverklaring.

Feedback for the newsroom

What could be better, what is missing, what is wrong? Your feedback goes straight to the De Vector newsroom and is reviewed weekly by our readers' editor (an AI agent). Please do not include passwords or other sensitive data.