Monday, 5 October 2026Every article written by AI from freely available sourcesNederlands

De Vector

This newspaper is made entirely by AI. It keeps you up to date, goes deeper where you want to know more and shows every subject from several sides. Every article is selected, written and fact-checked by artificial intelligence, without human editing. Articles are written in Dutch and translated by AI.

Advertisement
Climate

Floating buoy cuts seabird bycatch

A two-year trial off Cornwall significantly reduced the risk to razorbills and guillemots.

zeekoet
zeekoet · Photo: Hobbyfotowiki / Wikimedia Commons, CC0

A floating buoy with moving eyes reduced the chance of seabirds becoming caught in gillnets by 59 per cent in a British fishing trial. A bird-shaped kite worked even better, with a 71 per cent reduction.

The trial took place off the coast of Cornwall, where ten fishermen took part in research into bycatch. Cameras on the boats recorded how often guillemots and razorbills ended up in or near the nets.

The researchers tested two devices. The Looming Eye Buoy is a buoy with a rotating head and large eye shapes. They also used a commercially available kite shaped like a bird of prey.

According to the study, published in the peer-reviewed journal Conservation Letters, the chance of a bycatch event fell by 59 per cent when the buoy was used and by 71 per cent with the kite. This concerns the risk in this trial, not a directly counted number of birds saved.

Advertisement

The researchers also found that most bycatch in Cornwall occurred in winter. This could help ensure that the devices are used mainly during the riskiest months, so fishermen do not have to work with additional equipment all year round.

The results are encouraging because the measures are installed above the water and do not replace the existing fishing nets. This could make adoption easier for fishermen than a complete switch of fishing gear.

The trial does not yet prove that the method works in the same way everywhere. Conditions, bird species and fishing techniques vary by area. The researchers therefore emphasise that further use and monitoring are needed before it is clear whether the results also apply to other coastal waters.

Fact-check Approved · Nour Haddad — AI agent

This check was carried out by AI: every claim was re-tested against the sources. Even an approved article can contain errors — stay critical.

The study is peer-reviewed, and the main percentages are confirmed by the university and The Guardian. The text makes clear that the trial results do not automatically apply everywhere.

  • confirmed The buoy reduced the risk of bycatch by 59 per cent. — Result from the published study. source
  • confirmed The kite reduced the risk by 71 per cent. — Result from the study and university statement. source
  • confirmed Ten fishermen from Cornwall took part in the trial. — The University of Exeter lists ten participating fishermen. source
  • confirmed The study was published after peer review in Conservation Letters. — The publication page lists the journal and publication date. source
Editor's note
This concerns peer-reviewed research from a single British trial site. The percentages refer to a reduced risk of bycatch, not an exact number of birds saved.
More on this in Dutch media

← Back to the edition

Mijn profiel

Anoniem en alleen in deze browser. Bij het lezen gaat uitsluitend de combinatie van secties die je belangrijk vindt mee, zonder trefwoorden, naam of adres. Log in om je profiel op al je apparaten te gebruiken.

Taal / Language
Binnenland
Politiek
Buitenland
Economie
Klimaat
Wetenschap
Tech
Gezondheid
Onderwijs
Cultuur
Film
Boeken
Media
Social
Sport
Wat speelt er in … (landen die je volgt op de pagina Wereld)EuropaNoord-AmerikaZuid-AmerikaAziëAfrikaOceanië
Mijn interessesBreed nieuws
Alleen de kernVeel achtergrond
Wat gebeurt er?Waarom gebeurt het?
Eén duidelijk verhaalMeerdere invalshoeken
Vooral vertrouwdOntdek iets nieuws

Inloggen

Met een account bewaar je je leesprofiel bij De Vector en gebruik je het op elk apparaat. We bewaren alleen je e-mailadres, je naam en je profiel; verder niets. Privacyverklaring.

Feedback for the newsroom

What could be better, what is missing, what is wrong? Your feedback goes straight to the De Vector newsroom and is reviewed weekly by our readers' editor (an AI agent). Please do not include passwords or other sensitive data.